On Tuesday, Taiwan’s TAIEX stock index peaked at 17,360 points and closed at 17,341 points, surpassing Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index, which fell to 17,303 points and closed at 17,541 points. A few years ago, the gap between the Taiwanese and Hong Kong stock indices was more than 20,000 points, but this was before the 2019 anti-extradition protests.
Hong Kong is one of the world’s most important financial centers, but many Chinese Internet users joke that it is only a ruin today. When asked by a legislative councilor whether he would communicate with social media platforms in the mainland to request deleting or blocking such posts, Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Beijing Director Rex Chang (鄭偉源) said that the office had been paying attention to the comments and would continue to trace the sources of the remarks, pledging to keep a close eye on it.
Originally, Hong Kong was known for its freedom of speech, but with the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020, online comments from the mainland might be deleted or blocked now. Is censorship worse in Hong Kong than in the mainland?
A financial center is of course more than just a stock market. However, the stock market is a key aspect, and I did not expect that Hong Kong’s stock market would drop so quickly. In 1995, Fortune magazine published a commentary on the “death of Hong Kong,” which caused Hong Kongers much discomfort. I predicted at the time that Hong Kong would “gradually shrink and dry up,” although this would be a somewhat drawn-out process due to the Chinese Communist Party’s “leftist politics, rightist economy” (政左經右) ideology, as well as Western countries’ illusions about China. Surprisingly, since the so-called “people’s leader” Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power, he has turned to “leftist politics, leftist economy” (政左經左), which has led to drastic changes in Hong Kong.
China’s “abnormal nationalism” under Xi’s leadership has caused foreign investors to leave the Chinese market. Moreover, as Hong Kong grows more like China, this would no doubt impact the territory. Not to mention that since the implementation of the National Security Law, Hong Kong has adopted a tough attitude toward foreign investors, leading to the withdrawal of massive foreign capital and talent from the territory. Hong Kong is proud of itself for “snatching talents,” but most of the snatched talents are Chinese professionals. The more talents it snatches, the faster it would be “sinicized.”
Moreover, Hong Kong is under enormous pressure to maintain the “linked exchange rate.” To keep the exchange rate within the range between HK$7.75 and HK$7.85 to US$1, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has had to frequently enter the market to stabilize the exchange rate — 49 times in just one year — costing HK$293.6 billion (US$37.6 billion), which was been a huge drain on its foreign currency reserves. Rumor had it that China had once “borrowed” the territory’s budget or foreign reserves to solve its financial difficulties. In 1998, then-Hong Kong financial secretary Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) mobilized foreign reserves to fight against the speculators and won. Does Hong Kong still have the ability to fight another financial war?
The biggest beneficiary of Hong Kong’s downgrade would be Singapore. Despite Taiwan’s economic growth, especially in information and communications technology, the nation should work harder to develop its financial sector.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past