On Tuesday, Taiwan’s TAIEX stock index peaked at 17,360 points and closed at 17,341 points, surpassing Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index, which fell to 17,303 points and closed at 17,541 points. A few years ago, the gap between the Taiwanese and Hong Kong stock indices was more than 20,000 points, but this was before the 2019 anti-extradition protests.
Hong Kong is one of the world’s most important financial centers, but many Chinese Internet users joke that it is only a ruin today. When asked by a legislative councilor whether he would communicate with social media platforms in the mainland to request deleting or blocking such posts, Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Beijing Director Rex Chang (鄭偉源) said that the office had been paying attention to the comments and would continue to trace the sources of the remarks, pledging to keep a close eye on it.
Originally, Hong Kong was known for its freedom of speech, but with the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020, online comments from the mainland might be deleted or blocked now. Is censorship worse in Hong Kong than in the mainland?
A financial center is of course more than just a stock market. However, the stock market is a key aspect, and I did not expect that Hong Kong’s stock market would drop so quickly. In 1995, Fortune magazine published a commentary on the “death of Hong Kong,” which caused Hong Kongers much discomfort. I predicted at the time that Hong Kong would “gradually shrink and dry up,” although this would be a somewhat drawn-out process due to the Chinese Communist Party’s “leftist politics, rightist economy” (政左經右) ideology, as well as Western countries’ illusions about China. Surprisingly, since the so-called “people’s leader” Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power, he has turned to “leftist politics, leftist economy” (政左經左), which has led to drastic changes in Hong Kong.
China’s “abnormal nationalism” under Xi’s leadership has caused foreign investors to leave the Chinese market. Moreover, as Hong Kong grows more like China, this would no doubt impact the territory. Not to mention that since the implementation of the National Security Law, Hong Kong has adopted a tough attitude toward foreign investors, leading to the withdrawal of massive foreign capital and talent from the territory. Hong Kong is proud of itself for “snatching talents,” but most of the snatched talents are Chinese professionals. The more talents it snatches, the faster it would be “sinicized.”
Moreover, Hong Kong is under enormous pressure to maintain the “linked exchange rate.” To keep the exchange rate within the range between HK$7.75 and HK$7.85 to US$1, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has had to frequently enter the market to stabilize the exchange rate — 49 times in just one year — costing HK$293.6 billion (US$37.6 billion), which was been a huge drain on its foreign currency reserves. Rumor had it that China had once “borrowed” the territory’s budget or foreign reserves to solve its financial difficulties. In 1998, then-Hong Kong financial secretary Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) mobilized foreign reserves to fight against the speculators and won. Does Hong Kong still have the ability to fight another financial war?
The biggest beneficiary of Hong Kong’s downgrade would be Singapore. Despite Taiwan’s economic growth, especially in information and communications technology, the nation should work harder to develop its financial sector.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises