On Tuesday, Taiwan’s TAIEX stock index peaked at 17,360 points and closed at 17,341 points, surpassing Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index, which fell to 17,303 points and closed at 17,541 points. A few years ago, the gap between the Taiwanese and Hong Kong stock indices was more than 20,000 points, but this was before the 2019 anti-extradition protests.
Hong Kong is one of the world’s most important financial centers, but many Chinese Internet users joke that it is only a ruin today. When asked by a legislative councilor whether he would communicate with social media platforms in the mainland to request deleting or blocking such posts, Office of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Beijing Director Rex Chang (鄭偉源) said that the office had been paying attention to the comments and would continue to trace the sources of the remarks, pledging to keep a close eye on it.
Originally, Hong Kong was known for its freedom of speech, but with the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020, online comments from the mainland might be deleted or blocked now. Is censorship worse in Hong Kong than in the mainland?
A financial center is of course more than just a stock market. However, the stock market is a key aspect, and I did not expect that Hong Kong’s stock market would drop so quickly. In 1995, Fortune magazine published a commentary on the “death of Hong Kong,” which caused Hong Kongers much discomfort. I predicted at the time that Hong Kong would “gradually shrink and dry up,” although this would be a somewhat drawn-out process due to the Chinese Communist Party’s “leftist politics, rightist economy” (政左經右) ideology, as well as Western countries’ illusions about China. Surprisingly, since the so-called “people’s leader” Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power, he has turned to “leftist politics, leftist economy” (政左經左), which has led to drastic changes in Hong Kong.
China’s “abnormal nationalism” under Xi’s leadership has caused foreign investors to leave the Chinese market. Moreover, as Hong Kong grows more like China, this would no doubt impact the territory. Not to mention that since the implementation of the National Security Law, Hong Kong has adopted a tough attitude toward foreign investors, leading to the withdrawal of massive foreign capital and talent from the territory. Hong Kong is proud of itself for “snatching talents,” but most of the snatched talents are Chinese professionals. The more talents it snatches, the faster it would be “sinicized.”
Moreover, Hong Kong is under enormous pressure to maintain the “linked exchange rate.” To keep the exchange rate within the range between HK$7.75 and HK$7.85 to US$1, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has had to frequently enter the market to stabilize the exchange rate — 49 times in just one year — costing HK$293.6 billion (US$37.6 billion), which was been a huge drain on its foreign currency reserves. Rumor had it that China had once “borrowed” the territory’s budget or foreign reserves to solve its financial difficulties. In 1998, then-Hong Kong financial secretary Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) mobilized foreign reserves to fight against the speculators and won. Does Hong Kong still have the ability to fight another financial war?
The biggest beneficiary of Hong Kong’s downgrade would be Singapore. Despite Taiwan’s economic growth, especially in information and communications technology, the nation should work harder to develop its financial sector.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS