After almost five days, he is back: Sam Altman returns to OpenAI as its chief executive officer, the very same position he had held just 110 or so hours prior, in what will come to be known in Silicon Valley as “the time before OpenAI imploded.”
However, this saga has only reached the end of the beginning, leaving us wondering what happens next, and what it will mean for the future — not just for OpenAI, but artificial intelligence (AI) more broadly.
A new interim board for OpenAI has been formed. It includes Bret Taylor, former Salesforce Inc co-CEO; Larry Summers, former secretary of the Treasury under former US president Bill Clinton; and Adam D’Angelo, CEO of Quora Inc, who stays on from the previous board. More will join them — the finalized board will have up to nine directors in total. We will be able to draw bigger conclusions about OpenAI’s direction once we know who they are.
Illustration: Tania Chou
For now, the simplest interpretation is that this is a huge win for Microsoft Corp and its CEO, Satya Nadella. The US$2.8 trillion tech giant, which relies heavily on OpenAI as its partner in the AI revolution, has successfully protected its investment, without having to hire about 700 OpenAI engineers, as had once seemed plausible or even probable. They are not the only winners.
Here is my take on who will come out on top after this week. However, given the spectacular pace of events, it is subject to change.
WINNERS
Satya Nadella: Had OpenAI collapsed, serious questions would have been raised about how Microsoft could have so carelessly left itself exposed. Even if Microsoft could hire much of OpenAI’s talent, the amount of time and money that would have been spent getting the new subsidiary up to speed might have been enormous. The whole operation would have become mired in lawsuits as other OpenAI backers sought to claw back whatever value they could from their investments. On top of that, an influx of new talent, stuffed into the corner of a Microsoft office, would not have won Nadella many favors from within his own rank-and-file, still reeling from recent layoffs. Guess we willl never know.
Nadella could have no doubt done without the stress, but he is absolutely come out smelling of roses.
“We’re never going to get back into a situation where we get surprised like this ever again,” he told Kara Swisher on a podcast on Monday.
I will bet they will not.
Sam Altman: With a fresh mandate to press ahead with his vision of where AI should go, the face of the AI revolution is now the unquestionable decisionmaker at OpenAI. Can anyone stand in the way of King Sam the Unsackable? Emboldened by new allies — such as Taylor now on the board — Altman will have more protection and likely much less resistance to his commercial instincts.
It always seemed unlikely that Altman would ever be satisfied as a mere employee of a big tech company — he is a start-up guy at heart — and his tangle of outside interests would have proven cumbersome and potentially conflicting were he full-time on Microsoft’s payroll.
The simplicity of profit: This entire affair has been a win for those who think the idea of a nonprofit owning a for-profit entity is a folly, serving only to introduce unpredictable motives and irrational thinking (such as firing your world-famous CEO).
Regardless of the merits of the board’s choice, the undeniable fact is that the “power” of OpenAI’s board crumbled once the real heavies — those who have money, and data centers — began throwing their weight around. It was a capitalist company after all.
Sure, OpenAI could have existed, and continue to exist, in a different form without the multibillion-dollar backing, but it would have meant a wholly less successful and lavish affair. (Axios’ description of Microsoft as being OpenAI’s “sugar daddy” was particularly amusing, and depressingly accurate.)
Book publishers: After years of bountiful material offered up by villainized CEOs such as Travis Kalanick, Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried, publishers might have worried the tech-founder-gone-wild genre was going stale. Fear not.
LOSERS
The AI competition: What looked set to be a hiring free-for-all for the best and brightest in AI talent has been stopped in its tracks. Pleas from Salesforce (“Send me your CV directly,” CEO Marc Benioff said), Nvidia Corp and others do not seem likely to have drawn much talent from OpenAI’s ranks. And while potential clients of OpenAI were looking into alternatives because of the turmoil, the resolution may have come just quickly enough to stop any meaningful number of them jumping ship.
Emmett Shear: The former Twitch CEO must have thought he had hit the jackpot. Just months after leaving Amazon.com Inc — which acquired Twitch in 2014 — Shear suddenly found himself interim CEO of the most talked-about start-up in the world.
This opportunity likely seemed somewhat less exciting when much of his workforce reportedly flicked a middle-finger emoji in response to his surprise appointment. Once it became clear Shear took the job without having clarity of what had transpired with Altman, things turned more than a little embarrassing. Then we learned he was the board’s third choice. It is unclear what role he will play now.
Effective altruists: It has been a damaging time for effective altruists, those people who were meant to be a check on corporate power and focused on doing good — or, more to the point, not doing bad. OpenAI’s board was set up in such a way that concerns over the technology, and its possible impact on the safety of the human race, would be considered alongside the obvious commercial opportunity. After this week, those voices now seem to have been pushed out from OpenAI.
The human race: See above.
X: In some respects, it was like the good old days on what we once knew as Twitter. The social network was the drumbeat of a major news story, as well as a platform for rebellion. OpenAI’s employees posting heart emojis to show allegiance to Altman was a reminder of what once made Twitter so powerful. And yet, X’s owner, Elon Musk, was more occupied with filing a chilling lawsuit attacking the free speech of a nonprofit and dabbling in the ludicrous Pizzagate theory. (And then, as if things could not get any more serious, Paris Hilton quit her marketing deal.)
JURY’S OUT
Thrive Capital: Prior to this week’s mess it was reported that venture capital firm Thrive Capital was about to lead a tender offer to buy OpenAI employee shares in a deal that would value the company at more than US$80 billion. Thrive has signaled its intent to go ahead with that plan. But how soon, and at what value, is not clear.
Ilya Sutskever: The OpenAI chief scientist’s monumental decision to side with the altruists on the board was what tipped the majority against the CEO. Later, he went on X to say he regretted it. Altman responded with a heart emoji in a possible sign of forgiveness. But, I dunno, man.
This column: It has been a banner week for journalistic caveats. Whether its “emergency” podcasts declaring precisely when they were recorded, or newsletters making it quite clear that by the time it lands in your inbox, the OpenAI world may be again turned upside down.
So here is mine: I am finishing this piece just as news of Sam Altman’s reinstatement as chief executive has just been announced. Who knows what happens from here?
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS