In the elections in January next year, the public will be casting their votes for the president and legislators. Of course, it is expected that people’s focus will be on the next president, but the public is not only electing the national leader and their running mate; also they will be electing a governing team that will lead Taiwan for the next four years.
Despite much bad humor and stalled talks, the “blue-white alliance” finally had a breakthrough with former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as a witness. The two parties finally agreed to a poll selection to decide whether Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) or New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, would run for president with the other as his running mate. The two parties want to form a coalition government.
As Taiwan has never had a coalition government before, this is an unsettling possibility. If the Hou-Ko ticket is voted into office, it would mean that the president and vice president are not of the same party, while the heads of major offices would also be appointed by different parties. This would cause confusion and perplexity since there is no single leader and would complicate the issue of political responsibility.
During his first presidential term, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) also tried pushing for a coalition government by inviting Tang Fei (唐飛) of the KMT to be his premier and Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) to be the minister of the environment. However, both Tang and Hau joined the Cabinet as individuals, not as recommendations by the KMT. Even so, they left their positions before long. As a result, the idea of a coalition government is not realistic and could pose further problems.
Even within the same party, there are competing factions that often lead to discord or quarrels, but there is a party chairperson to decide and resolve conflicts. In the case of a coalition government, if Cabinet members of different parties come into conflict, which party chairperson would be the adjudicator? Even the president cannot have a say on the matter, because Cabinet members’ power does not come from the Cabinet leader or the president.
One case in point being Ko, who said in a TV interview that if the Hou-Ko ticket triumphs in the end, he would do his best to “oversee” Hou and the KMT. A vice president who supervises the president? Now that would be a first in politics.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said that next year’s election is a choice between democracy and autocracy. This means that if people decide to cast their votes for pro-China parties, it would be choosing a pivot to autocracy over democracy, values that most Taiwanese do not endorse. If the Hou-Ko ticket comes to pass, the result would be a choice between a single, well-ordered government, and a chaotic, coalition government. The public will have to draw upon their wisdom to make the right choice.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Rita Wang
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No