The nationwide buzz over a potential joint opposition presidential bid between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) stands in contrast to its moribund state, with signs of the negotiations heading for a breakdown. The reason the “blue-white alliance” has turned into a Gordian knot is that both parties fail to see eye to eye on political stances and ideology.
However, no one is walking more of a tightrope than Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
Gou can be likened to Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the Danish prince who vacillates between action and inaction. In Gou’s case, it is vacillating between seeing his independent campaign through to the end or calling it quits. After all, Gou found himself caught between three powers: the US, China and the Taiwanese public.
On the one hand, he has China holding a knife behind his back, with Chinese authorities investigating the company in China with tax and compliance issues.
On the other hand, the US is nudging him to run by helping Tammy Lai (賴佩霞), his running mate, “accelerate” her application process of forfeiting her US citizenship, which under normal circumstances would take three to six months, but took Lai less than 40 days.
Caught between Scylla and Charybdis, Gou has another issue. As the Central Election Commission regulations say that Gou and Lai had to prove by Thursday last week that they had 289,667 signatures to be eligible to register as candidates, the pair made it over the threshold with more than 1.03 million signatures, a number that shows he has a degree of support and that he would let down a fair share of people if he were to quit. It was probably due to the pressure of these three powers that Gou did not make a grand show when submitting the signatures.
As Gou’s popularity has nosedived in recent months, TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), or New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the KMT’s candidate, are still thinking of courting his support.
According to polling, if either Ko or Hou win over Gou’s supporters, the effect would amount to a support rate increase of about 7 to 10 percentage points. Rather than looking for an ally who does not share the same party goals, perhaps the KMT could reconsider Gou as a potential ally. Given Gou’s history with the KMT, albeit one with histrionics and drama, it is apparent that Gou’s ideology falls in line with the KMT and would prove an easier candidate to cozy up to than with Ko.
Gou’s forte is that he does not have any party baggage, nor does he have to deal with the issue of legislative seats or party ballots. For supporters of the pan-blue camp, Gou could be a more “comfortable” solution than Ko, not to mention that a large percentage of Gou’s supporters are independent voters or young people, which overlaps with Ko’s supporters. If allied together, the KMT would be able to bring Ko’s haughtiness down a notch and could deal a blow to Ko’s support. Gou’s diplomatic vision and monetary resources could give an edge to the KMT’s campaign. Furthermore, Gou and the KMT see eye to eye on a host of issues, including economic development and cross-strait policy.
Vice versa, if Ko gets to Gou first, Ko would solidify second place and obtain more than 300 signature collection offices as his campaign stations overnight. It would also take a further step in marginalizing Hou from the race, a move that the KMT would have to take caution over.
Gou’s Hamlet moment could become a turning point in the campaign for either the KMT or the TPP. The only question that remains is who gets to him first.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS