There has been extensive discussion recently about Cheng Da bookstore’s decision to close all of its branches.
Now, with the ongoing campaigns for the Taiwanese presidential election, I hope that every candidate could pay attention to books, promote reading and provide a boost to both publishers and booksellers.
In a recent trip to South Korea, I, along with several members of the Taipei Book Fair Foundation, learned something about the state of the country’s publishing industry and the effectiveness of its fixed book pricing system.
During a visit to the Korean Publishers Society (KOPUS), the publishers mentioned an interesting campaign, “I Want to See the President’s Love of Reading,” which was launched during the country’s presidential election in 2017.
The campaign’s organizers hoped that the presidential candidates, by purchasing and reading books, could set an example for the public to follow, while generating policies favoring the publishing industry and thinking of ways to elevate reading culture more broadly.
Previously, in an effort to provide book recommendations and stimulate discussion, KOPUS and the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy had together launched “Book Lovers of Parliament,” a recurring event that ran from 2013 to 2015.
Each iteration saw authors, members of parliament and government authorities invited to participate in conversations designed to increase parliamentary awareness of reading and culture-related issues. Sixty members of parliament participated in the monthly event, which was repeated 16 times over the two years.
In 2014, after 10 years of development, South Korea implemented a fixed book pricing system, and the policies have now been in effect for the better part of a decade.
According to this system, books are generally not discounted within the first 18 months of publication. At most, they are discounted by 10 percent against the recommended retail price; if freebies or other incentives are included in a promotion, the additional discount is limited to 5 percent.
After the 18-month period has passed, prices can be reduced, but this requires a reprint, a change in the book’s ISBN or that a new list-price sticker be attached to the book. However, the maximum discount rate remains unchanged.
The fixed book pricing system was accompanied by a coordinated set of measures, including the establishment of a supervisory board responsible for inspecting violations and ensuring reasonable prices.
These measures caution readers that price wars only encourage inflated pricing and remind them that discounted prices do not always represent the best deals, as seen in Taiwan, about four decades ago, when eyeglasses and chandeliers were initially priced exorbitantly and then subjected to heavy discounts that at times approached 70 percent or 80 percent. Having a clear and fixed pricing can spare consumers the trouble of comparing fluctuating prices, allowing publishers to focus on quality over quantity, instead of engaging in cutthroat pricing.
The implementation of the fixed book pricing system led to an increase in annual book sales in South Korea from 2018 to 2020, and the nation’s three major channels, Kyobo, Yes24 and Aladin, saw their combined revenue increase from US$1.07 billion to US$1.32 billion per year. In addition, about US$3 billion in sales was generated in the e-book market.
Elsewhere in the industry, the number of independent bookstores trended upward: In 2015, there were only 97 independent bookstores in operation across the country; by 2020, this number had increased to 634.
According to the 2020 KOPUS survey of 1,001 bookstores and publishing companies, 67.3 percent of bookstore and publishing company owners were overall satisfied with the system and believed it benefited the entire industry. Happily, the Constitutional Court of Korea recently confirmed its legal validity.
Former US president Barack Obama is well-known for being an avid reader, and many are curious to learn which books line his shelves. Julianne Buonocore, moderator of The Literary Lifestyle blog, said that her community eagerly anticipates Obama’s much-publicized annual picks.
With Taiwan’s presidential election in full swing, one can imagine candidates browsing independent bookstores, grabbing some titles and sharing their literary loves. Would that not be great? So simple a gesture could provide a significant lift to publishers and booksellers, while representing a refreshing change from the usual political tit for tat and squabbling.
Jerome C. Su is the chair of Bookman Books Ltd and an adjunct associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Translation and Interpretation at National Taiwan Normal University.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS