When Talyn Summers was in middle school, their parents started receiving e-mails and text messages from their school multiple times a day. The problem? Summers had eaten school lunch, but had not paid in full: They owed US$0.30.
In a fairly well-off school district in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Summers remembers feeling like their peers were completely oblivious that other students might be plagued by the shame of “lunch debt.”
While the US offers free school meals to its poorest students, many who do not qualify still struggle to pay.
More than 30 million students in the US cannot afford their school meals, the Education Data Initiative says.
On average, those students owe US$180.60 each year — an annual national total of US$262 million in student lunch debt.
“There’s people who are very, very poor, and they are getting free or reduced [meals], and those people who are very wealthy, that are unbothered [by the cost], but then there’s that very forgotten large middle element, which is not receiving the help they need, but is still suffering from the debt,” said Summers, 18, who is part of the Pennsylvania Cancel Lunch Debt Coalition, an activist group associated with the local Democratic Socialists of America chapter, and the Debt Collective, a debtors’ union.
The coalition has since organized to have more than US$20,000 in school meal debt canceled in Bucks County, and seen state legislators introduce bills to provide universal school meals in the state, something that was offered nationwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, but ended last year. Now, it seems, their national representatives are paying attention, too.
Last week, US Senator John Fetterman — who chairs the US Senate Subcommittee on Food and Nutrition, Specialty Crops, Organics and Research — introduced a bill that would cancel all student meal debt.
The bill, titled the School Lunch Debt Cancellation Act, would order the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to pay off all of the debt that students accumulate when they cannot afford school lunches or breakfasts. It was cosponsored by US senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Peter Welch.
“‘School lunch debt’ is a term so absurd that it shouldn’t even exist,” Fetterman wrote on social media platform X. “That’s why I’m proud to introduce a bill to CANCEL the nation’s student meal debt and stop humiliating kids and penalizing hunger.”
In the US, public and non-profit private schools use a three-tiered system to determine how much students pay for school meals. Students living within 130 percent of the poverty line are eligible to receive free school meals, those within 185 percent can receive meals at reduced prices and all others pay full price, but many families who are not eligible for free or reduced meals still struggle to pay. For families who are eligible, paperwork and the stigma around accepting free meals can also be barriers to access.
“As a result, many families who aren’t signed up for free or reduced price meals still can’t afford them, and this can result in school meal debt,” said Juliana Cohen, a professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Merrimack College.
Schools are not allowed to use federal child nutrition funds to pay off that meal debt, so many instead search for charitable donors — or tap into student activity or education funds.
Sometimes, to dissuade students from accumulating more debt, schools publicly shame them or give them a sandwich instead of a hot meal, advocates say.
Vito Malacari, a high-school government and civics teacher in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, has seen students at his school collect a hot meal in the lunch line, only to be forced to dump it in the trash and exchange it for a cold sandwich when they cannot pay.
“Everybody knows what that means, that you can’t afford a hot lunch,” said Malacari, who is also a member of the Pennsylvania Cancel Lunch Debt Coalition.
At the beginning of the pandemic, the US Congress authorized the USDA to provide free meals to every public school student in the country, about 50 million children. Last year, when the program was scheduled to expire, Republican lawmakers blocked attempts to extend the program.
Asother pandemic-era safety nets began evaporating last year, child poverty more than doubled.
Since then, nine states — California, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico and Vermont — have introduced programs making school breakfasts and lunches permanently free.
Meanwhile, advocates are calling on lawmakers to make school meals free nationwide. Fetterman is among the cosponsors of the Universal School Meals Program Act, a bill which would provide free breakfast, lunch, dinner and a snack to every student.
Hunger can make it challenging for students to perform well in school.
In a pre-COVID-19 study, the organization No Kid Hungry found that nearly 60 percent of children from low-income communities went to school hungry — and of those, 12 percent said that hunger made it impossible for them to concentrate on their evening homework.
Food insecurity is also linked to adverse mental health outcomes for children, Cohen said.
While schools were offering free meals to all students during the pandemic, Cohen and her colleagues at Merrimack College’s Nourish Lab were able to observe the effects of universal free school meals.
“Students who are already eligible and signed up for free or reduced price meals are now more likely to eat them,” Cohen said.
They also found that free meals offered nutritional benefits to all students.
Students who eat school meals consume more whole grains, milk, fruits and vegetables, and do better in school than those who do not, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says.
Canceling student meal debt would not solve the entire problem, “but this is such an important step in recognizing the challenge of school meal debt, which can be crushing for schools,” Cohen said.
Now a high-school senior, Summers said the weight of student lunch debt still hangs over them — they fear their school could threaten to not let them graduate if they do not pay off the balance they owe.
“This is one of the scariest and most pervasive forms of debt that we have, because it is directly affecting children,” Summers said.
For many students, who deal with the shame of not being able to afford a hot meal every day only to wonder if they’ll be able to afford college, a car or a house, “it feels like just starting the doom clock early,” they added.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that