Across the globe, data servers are humming, consuming megawatts and precious natural resources to bring life to our digital world.
The planet’s 8,000 or so data centers are the foundation of our online existence and will grow ever further with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) — so much so that research estimates that by 2025, the IT industry could use 20 percent of all electricity produced and emit up to 5.5 percent of the world’s carbon.
This poses a real — and to some, increasingly urgent — question about the industry’s carbon footprint as start-ups and other companies fall behind Silicon Valley’s latest forward march.
“Pandora’s box is open,” said Arun Iyengar, chief executive officer of Untether AI, a highly specialized chipmaking company that strives to make AI more energy efficient.
“We can utilize AI in ways that enhance the climate requirements or we can ignore the climate requirements and find ourselves facing the consequences in a decade or so in terms of the impact,” Iyengar said.
The transformation of the world’s data servers to AI readiness is already well under way, in what one Google executive called a “once-in-a-generation inflection point in computing.”
However, the scope of the mission is huge.
The creation of generative AI tools such as GPT-4, which powers ChatGPT, or Google’s Palm2, behind the bot Bard, can be broken into two key stages, the actual “training” and then the execution, or “inference.”
In 2019, University of Massachusetts Amherst researchers trained several large-language models, and found that training a single AI model can emit the carbon equivalent of what five vehicles do over their lifetimes.
A more recent study by Google and the University of California, Berkeley reported that training GPT-3 resulted in 552 tonnes of carbon emissions, equivalent to driving a passenger vehicle 2 million kilometers.
OpenAI’s latest generation model, GPT-4, is trained on about 570 times more parameters — or inputs — than GPT-3, and the scale of these systems will only grow as AI becomes more powerful and ubiquitous.
Nvidia, AI’s chip giant, provides the processors that are indispensable for training, known as GPUs. And while they are more energy efficient than typical chips, they remain formidable consumers of power.
The other side of generative AI is deployment, or inference — when the trained model is applied to identify objects, respond to text prompts or whatever the use case might be.
Deployment does not necessarily need the computing heft of a Nvidia chip, but taken cumulatively, the endless interactions in the real world far outweigh training in terms of workload.
“Inference is going to be even more of a problem now with ChatGPT, which can be used by anyone and integrated into daily life through apps and Web searches,” said Lynn Kaack, assistant professor of computer science at the Hertie School in Berlin.
The biggest cloud companies insist that they are committed to being as energy efficient as possible.
Amazon Web Services pledges to be carbon-neutral by 2040, while Microsoft has pledged to be carbon-negative by 2030. The latest evidence that the companies are serious about energy efficiency is reassuring. Between 2010 and 2018, global data center energy use rose by only 6 percent, despite a 550 percent increase in workloads and computing instances, International Energy Agency data showed.
Silicon Valley’s AI tycoons believe discussions of AI’s current carbon footprint are beside the point and underplay its revolutionary potential.
The naysayers have it “backwards,” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) told reporters on a recent visit to his company’s headquarters in California.
The mass deployment of AI and faster computing will in the end diminish the need to go to the world’s data clouds, he said.
AI’s superpowers will turn your laptop, vehicle or the device in your pocket into an energy-efficient supercomputer without the need to “retrieve” data from the cloud.
“In the future, there’ll be a little tiny model that sits on your phone and 90 percent of the pixels will be generated, 10 percent will be retrieved, instead of 100 percent retrieved — and so you’re going to save” energy, he said.
Meanwhile, OpenAI’s Sam Altman believes that AI will soon enough be able to build humanity a completely new future.
“I think once we have a really powerful super intelligence, addressing climate change will not be particularly difficult,” Altman said recently. “This illustrates how big we should dream... Think about a system where you can say: ‘Tell me how to make a lot of clean energy cheaply, tell me how to efficiently capture carbon and tell me how to build a factory to do this at planetary scale.’”
However, some experts worry that the mad dash for AI has elbowed out fears about the planet, at least for now.
“Large corporations are spending a lot of money right now deploying AI. I don’t think they are thinking about the environmental impact yet,” Iyengar said.
However, “I think that is coming,” he added.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS