Facing a seventh consecutive monthly increase in the youth unemployment rate, the Chinese government on Aug. 15 announced that it would suspend publication of the figures. The move has raised international concerns about the country’s worsening, nontransparent economy.
The unemployment rate among those aged 16 to 24 in China was 17.3 percent in January, 18.1 percent in February, 19.6 percent in March, 20.4 percent in April, 20.8 percent in May and a record 21.3 percent in June, meaning more than one in five young Chinese did not have a job. Chinese academics even estimated that the actual unemployment rate was 46 percent, because young people in rural townships had not been surveyed. The Chinese National Bureau of Statistics said it stopped releasing the youth unemployment rate due to a need to “optimize the survey approach,” but did not say when it would start releasing the figures again.
It is not the first time Beijing has restricted access to official data it considers unflattering or politically embarrassing. Since 2017, China has also stopped sharing its fertility rate data. A Chinese media report recently gave a rare insight into the country’s demographic crisis, saying its fertility rate last year plunged to a record low of 1.09. That would worsen the country’s negative population growth and shrinking labor force. A Bloomberg report said that Chinese figures crucial to foreign investors have become unavailable, including bond transactions, corporate registration data, land sales, currency reserves, COVID-19 deaths and academic information, while politicians’ biographies can be erased, just like when China’s foreign minister was abruptly removed from his role without explanation last month.
By covering up unpleasant statistics, Beijing intends to blind its disillusioned citizens and pacify discontented young Chinese, especially as such information could be considered a threat to its rule. The Chinese government has even removed several prominent writers’ social media posts on the country’s unemployment rate or stock market.
These moves suggest that crucial benchmark data can be highly politicized in China, and that there could be more “ bad news” regarding the country’s economy.
While US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo this week met her Chinese counterpart to keep communications open, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan criticized China for reducing access to its economic data and cracking down on firms in China that had been sharing such data, calling its behavior “irresponsible.”
The lack of economic transparency has partially contributed to foreign investors’ doubts about China, as Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange data showed that direct foreign investment to China in the second quarter of this year had declined 87 percent year-on-year — the largest drop on record. Taiwan’s investment in ASEAN markets in the first half of this year surpassed the volume bound for China, indicating another shift.
The Mainland Affairs Council has warned Taiwanese traveling to China to refrain from talking about sensitive issues the Chinese government is trying to cover up to avoid being detained.
However, Taiwan still needs to be cautious and confront the flow of young Taiwanese going to China to work and study, especially as Beijing is offering thousands of job opportunities via a state-backed work program, aiming to recruit young Taiwanese talent for its “united front” purposes.
Some Chinese social media users have mocked their government, saying: “Covering your mouth and closing your eyes, can that really solve the problem?”
Yet Beijing’s freedom of information curbs not only makes cross-strait exchanges meaningless, but increase the risks Taiwanese and all foreigners could face in China.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS