Economic news from China has triggered the same helpless, sinking feeling that gripped me when Japan’s property bubble collapsed from 1991 to 1992. With China heading down the same path of deflation and stagnation which Japan embarked on three decades ago, would this sense of deja vu continue?
This month, Evergrande Group — the Chinese real-estate developer that defaulted on its debt in 2021 — filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection in the US in the hopes of restructuring its dollar-denominated debts. Chapter 15 allows a US court to intervene in an insolvency case involving another country. Meanwhile, property developer Country Garden has missed US$22.5 million in payments for offshore bonds and suspended trading in 11 onshore bonds, raising the prospect of a default.
These are hardly isolated incidents. China’s real-estate sector is buckling under the weight of falling prices, a large inventory of unsold housing and office buildings which is showing no signs of slowing, and highly indebted developers. A property bubble collapse seems likelier every day.
The implications for growth could be dire. Annual Japanese GDP growth amounted to 4 to 5 percent on average, from the mid-1970s through to the 1980s. After the property bubble burst, that rate sank to 0 to 2 percent. Japan’s economy has not recaptured its prebubble dynamism ever since.
China is already experiencing a sharp slowdown in its growth. While it is normal for a fast-growing emerging-market economy to slow as income per capita increases, the scale of China’s slowdown in last year and this year is notable. In the second quarter of this year, quarterly GDP grew by just 0.8 percent, compared to 2.2 percent in the first quarter.
To be sure, second-quarter growth amounted to 6.3 percent in year-on-year terms, and the government’s annual growth target of 5 percent could yet be achieved. Nonetheless, China’s economic prospects appear to be dimming rapidly. Falling inflation — the consumer price index declined last month by 0.3 percent year on year — further darkens the outlook, as it points to possible deflation.
While China’s travails can be blamed partly on its delayed exit from its “zero COVID-19” policy, investment slowdown has played a major role. Foreign portfolio investors are pulling out of Chinese capital markets, and inward foreign direct investment is declining fast.
This is partly the result of the US-China decoupling, but it is also a reaction to China’s anti-espionage law, under which foreign businesses have been prosecuted for activities that are normal everywhere else in the world. It was under that law that a Japanese employee of the drug-maker Astellas Pharma Inc was detained in March, and he has yet to be released. Unsurprisingly, foreign companies are finding it difficult to recruit employees willing to work in China.
The manipulation and obfuscation of data by Chinese authorities offers more reason for pessimism. China’s announcement that it would no longer disclose youth unemployment figures suggests that the level of joblessness among young Chinese people is dire. With even official data showing that China’s population began to decline last year, growing unemployment (and under-employment) can mean only one thing: the economy as a whole is weakening fast.
China’s demographic decline is its own cause for concern. As Japan can attest, a shrinking working-age population stokes powerful social and fiscal pressures, not least ballooning pension costs and worker shortages in labor-intensive industries, including medical and long-term care. Given decades of fertility-control policies, China would confront a much faster demographic transition than Japan did. And while it has expanded social-security protections in recent years, much more must be done to meet the demographic challenge ahead.
Two factors unique to China would affect how any economic crisis unfolds. First, because a large share of real-estate investment is carried out through so-called local government financing vehicles, the sector’s performance has a direct impact on public balance sheets. Debt held by local government financing vehicles (LGFV) reached an estimated 165.57 trillion yuan (US$22.7 trillion) — or 42 percent of GDP — at the end of last year.
Given this, if a property bubble bursts, local governments would suffer severe debt distress, and might even default, potentially delivering a sharp blow to both domestic and international investors. To help mitigate the risks, the central government has authorized local governments to issue their own bonds, revenues from which can be used to repay LGFV debts.
However, while this would improve balance sheet transparency, it is ultimately just substituting one form of debt for another.
The second factor unique to China is that its four biggest banks are state-owned, so the central bank and the government can always step in to provide capital and avert a banking crisis. Repeated capital injections might be viewed as a sign of moral hazard.
However, only 20 percent of non-performing loans (NPLs) in China are the result of risk-management failures by banks, the rest are loans that were directed by the government or issued to distressed state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Any bailout is just a case of the government taking responsibility for the lending it directed.
If the property bubble bursts, China’s banks and government must avoid the mistakes Japan made three decades ago. Full and timely disclosure of NPLs is essential. Chinese banks must not succumb to the “evergreening” temptation and extend new loans to insolvent “zombie” borrowers so that they appear healthy. Furthermore, capital injections must be delivered quickly to where they are needed.
Likewise, China’s government should take steps to stop the evergreening of SOEs and real-estate companies, and ensure that banks and LGFVs pursue debt restructuring, supported by capital injections if needed. Local governments should be allowed to raise taxes, using the added revenues to pay down their debts.
If China fails to address the risks that its economy is accumulating, a Japan-style period of stagnation and deflation would become inevitable, and the entire world would suffer.
Takatoshi Ito, a former Japanese deputy vice minister of finance, is a professor at the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University and a senior professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS