In the jungle of a southeast Asian country, an elephant calf fell into a deep well. The mother elephant was deeply upset and agitated. She walked to the main road and wailed, hoping that a passing vehicle would come to her aid. Most people, not understanding what she was doing, paid no attention to her pleas. Eventually, a truck driver stopped out of curiosity.
He followed the elephant to the well and saw what had happened. He immediately called for help. Workers arrived, digging the mud out to save the calf. The mother elephant was elated. She could finally take her baby back to the jungle.
The people cheered.
As the saying goes: Saving a life is a nobler act than building a seven-story pagoda for Buddha.
“Life” applies to human beings and animals.
Another story is even more touching. Two elephant calf siblings fell into a well. They could not get out. The mother elephant was afraid they would drown, so she got into the well and held the baby elephants above the water.
The father elephant sought help elsewhere. Whenever he saw a vehicle passing, he knelt down.
A driver stopped and discovered what was happening, and called for an excavator to save the three elephants. Thanks to the mother elephant and help from a human being, the calves were saved.
Similarly, Ukraine is being attacked by its hostile neighbor Russia. European countries and the US offer help out of humanity and fear of being attacked by Russia.
Taiwanese have also taken on some responsibility. In addition to generous donations from the government and the public, some young Taiwanese have volunteered to help the Ukrainian army.
However, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has sneered at such actions.
Some KMT members have mocked Ukrainians, saying they lack understanding. It was because the Ukrainians provoked Moscow that Russia invaded, some KMT members say.
The KMT also said that some Taiwanese were stupid enough to support Ukraine. They seem to believe that Taiwanese should protect themselves only.
The two elephant stories are worth thinking about. The well is like the “one China” principle. If Taiwan were to “jump into the well,” no other nations could save it even if they wanted to.
However, if Taiwan were to accidentally fall into the well and was trying its best to find a way out, the international community would become the people who saved the elephants. They would not pass by without understanding. Out of a sense of humanity and the fear of being caught in the same situation, nations would step up.
Taiwan’s security has everything to do with the survival of the international community.
If Taiwanese had not offered Ukraine assistance, who would help when it is in trouble?
How can the KMT be so cruel? Does it deserve any support from Taiwanese?
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Emma Liu
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS