Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell by at least 60 percent last month compared with the same month last year, Brazilian Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Marina Silva said.
The good news came ahead of a regional summit that aims to prevent South America’s largest biome from hitting a calamitous tipping point.
The exact figure, which is based on the Deter satellite alert system, is to be released in the coming days, but independent analysts described the preliminary data as “incredible,” and said the improvement compared with the same month last year could be the best since 2005.
The rapid progress highlights the importance of political change. A year ago, under then-Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro the Amazon was suffering one of the worst cutting and burning seasons in recent history.
Yet since a new administration led by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took power at the start of the year, the government has penalized land grabbers, mounted paramilitary operations to drive out illegal miners, demarcated more indigenous land and created more conservation areas.
The results are likely to bolster Lula, Silva and other Brazilian hosts of an Amazon summit designed to reinforce regional cooperation that is taking place in Belem today and tomorrow with the participation of the nine rainforest nations: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela.
Silva said the acute threat of the climate crisis, which has brought record heat to many South American countries, means the summit has to be more than a show of unity; it needs to produce concrete and continuous results to ensure the Amazon does not reach a point where it starts to dry up and die off, which scientists have warned is drawing closer.
She has proposed that each country produces an action plan, that they jointly create a scientific panel to keep them updated with the latest data, and that they share best practices to achieve the three goals of the summit: protection of the forest and traditional peoples, and to combat inequality and strengthen democracy.
The key to the improvement in Brazil, which is home to 60 percent of the Amazon, had been a major target, she said.
“The main reason is the decision of Lula to aim for zero deforestation. Since then, we have created new conservation units and indigenous territories that have produced some results. Now we need to move towards a new model of prosperity that is less predatory, less damaging to local people and the forest,” Silva said.
In the first half of this year, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell 34 percent from the same period last year, according to the Deter satellite alert system.
The figures for July, which is a more revealing month as it usually marks the onset of the clearance season, are still being collated, but Silva said they would show a significant improvement of “at least 60 percent” since the same period last year.
Independent analysts believe this might even reach as high as 70 percent.
“It’s incredible, totally crazy,” said Tasso Azevedo, a forest engineer and founder of the MapBiomas analytical group. “This is on course to be the sharpest fall since 2005. We are still figuring out why this is happening so fast.”
He believes the slowdown is due to a combination of factors: the resumption of embargoes and other protection activities by the government, improved technical analysis that reveal where problems are occurring more quickly and in more detail, greater involvement by banks to deny credit to landowners involved in clearing trees, and also wariness among farmers generated by the EU new laws on deforestation-free trade.
It might be no coincidence that deforestation has not fallen as impressively in the Cerrado savanna, which is not yet covered by the EU’s controls.
Silva said that a single month based on preliminary satellite data does not represent a trend.
A clearer picture might take a couple of years because the government’s annual tally runs from August to July, which means this year’s total would include the devastating past five months of Bolsonaro’s administration.
Nonetheless, Silva saw encouraging signs compared with the last time she was environment minister, from 2003 to 2008. Back then, the ministry had not been run down as it was during the Bolsonaro years and federal police mounted major support operations, which has not so far been the case this year, but it still took two years before policies started to show results.
This year, the ministry has had to make do with far fewer resources and to rely more on remote embargoes of soy and cattle based on satellite monitoring.
“It’s different now. The problem is more serious and more complex, but we have more experience and we know how to do it,” Silva said.
She hopes the improvement can be a springboard for a new cycle of prosperity in the Amazon and beyond, based on a sustainable use of resources, open markets to certified products, the development of a bioeconomy and greater financial support from wealthy countries that benefit from the rainforest’s role as a climate stabilizer and rainmaker.
Outside investment, trade and financial support would be crucial to show there is a viable alternative to destructive cattle ranches and soy plantations.
Due to her success in combating the worst excesses of forest clearance, Silva has come under fierce attack from the agribusiness and oil lobbies in Brazil, and the Brazilian National Congress has eroded the power of her ministry.
She faces an additional challenge from El Nino, which has brought horrifying temperatures of 38.9°C to the Chilean Andes in mid-winter, desperate water shortages to Uruguay and monthly heat records in several parts of Brazil. This is expected to worsen drought and fire risks in the Amazon over the coming months, though they would have been worse if the previous president’s policies have been continued.
Lula and Silva have committed their political futures to zero deforestation and plan to push for continued reductions in the run-up to the UN COP30 climate conference, which is expected to be held in the Amazon city of Belem in 2025.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS