The 2023 Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum is scheduled for next month in Shanghai. It will be the 14th forum since it was launched in 2010, and also the first in which Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) participates as Taipei mayor.
It is unclear exactly how beneficial the twin-city forum has been to the residents of Taipei over the course of the past decade or so. By all appearances, it has become little more than a stage for the Taipei mayor to build personal relations with the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
Before he left office last year, then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) went against the Taipei City Council’s resolution by insisting on holding the 13th twin-city forum despite the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) constant threat against Taiwan with warplanes and warships.
As a result, Ko saddled the Taipei City Government with a debt of nearly NT$1 million (US$31,857) for the cost of the forum that has remained unresolved.
If the twin-city forum was really for the city’s and its residents’ benefit, would the council have opposed it? Ko’s wife claimed that the Ko family would pay the debt out of its own pocket if necessary, but as it would later emerge, it only talked the talk. It did not walk the walk.
This year’s twin-city forum is set to take place late next month, which is very close to the 65th anniversary of the “823 Artillery Bombardment” launched by China against Taiwan’s Kinmen on Aug. 23, 1958, during the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis. On this day of great significance, as a descendant of then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), the mayor should stay in Taiwan just to observe the Chiang family’s spirit of “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist” (漢賊不兩立).
How ironic it is that he is going instead to meet with top CCP officials for a merry shindig in Shanghai, instead of paying respects to the brave Taiwanese troops who died resisting the Chinese People’s Liberation Army in Kinmen.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS