The National Development Council (NDC) last week reported that Taiwan’s business monitoring indicators remained “blue” for a seventh straight month in May, pointing at a continued economic slowdown, while the index of leading indicators fell for a second consecutive month, adding to worries about persistent weakness in the nation’s export-reliant economy.
The index of leading indicators seeks to forecast the economic landscape in the next six months. After rising for five consecutive months from November last year to March, the trend-adjusted index failed to maintain its upward momentum and started to drop in April. The NDC’s data showed that the index dropped 0.28 percent in May, following a 0.19 percent fall the previous month.
Among the index’s seven components, the reading on imports of semiconductor equipment decreased 0.61 percent monthly in May, following a decline of 0.59 percent the previous month, and the gauge for the floor area of building permits dropped 0.25 percent after a fall of 0.20 percent in April, while export orders also weighed on the index, with declines widening from 0.05 percent to 0.14 percent.
Past studies on the relationship between the index of leading indicators and the annual GDP growth rate have shown a positive correlation between the two, as they tended to peak or bottom out almost simultaneously. As the leading indicators are still falling, it means Taiwan’s economy is not out of the woods yet.
Furthermore, a closer look at the NDC’s data on business monitoring indicators shows that Taiwan’s economic situation remains exposed to short-term downside risks, as inventory destocking in the supply chain is ongoing, while spillover effects have started to affect corporate investment.
For instance, among the nine components that make up the business monitoring indicators, the reading on the manufacturing sector’s business climate, which is used to gauge the economy’s direction in the medium to long term, fell for a second consecutive month in May. The NDC attributed the slowdown to weak growth momentum around the world, which resulted in a longer-than-expected inventory adjustment in the supply chain.
As a result, local manufacturers of consumer electronics continued to report sluggish shipments and steelmakers remained conservative in their outlook, while the prices of petrochemical products, and plastic and rubber goods continued to fall, the NDC’s data showed.
Even though the data on business monitoring indicators revealed that the narrow M1B money supply increased 3.4 percent in May following a 2.7 percent rise the previous month, and the stock price gauge decreased 1.5 percent compared with a decline of 7.5 percent in April, those improvements were driven by near-term factors, such as US chipmaker Nvidia Corp’s blowout revenue forecast in late May, which triggered artificial intelligence (AI) hype around the world and drove foreign fund inflows into AI-related stocks in the local equity market.
The NDC data showed relative resilience in Taiwan’s household consumption and domestic labor market on the back of post-COVID-19 pandemic consumption and the government’s incentive measures.
However, external headwinds remain ahead, such as the implications of central banks’ interest rate hikes and geopolitical confrontations.
In a nutshell, it would be unlikely for the business monitoring indicators to show significant upward movement in the short term, until a definitive turnaround materializes, and the “blue” signal is likely to linger for a while.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS