From June 16 to Monday last week, China held its 15th Straits Forum in Xiamen Province. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) billed it as the largest convention for cross-strait exchanges in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) issued a congratulatory letter, while Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧), China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) and officials across China’s Fujian Province gathered for the forum.
Although there were few representatives from Taiwan, Beijing endeavored to put together 51 “united front” activities, including holding receptions and luring participants in the name of tourism and religion, and mobilizing 5,000 Taiwanese living in China. Despite all these efforts, the event was uninspiring and dull. Not all that glitters is gold.
Unsurprisingly, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) sent a delegation of high-level officials. KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) led the delegation on behalf of party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) sent its Taiwanese Businesspeople Affairs Committee chairman, Chang Kai-chun (張凱鈞). Before they left for Xiamen, Hsia and Chang repeatedly emphasized that the KMT and the TPP were attending the event to promote peace and communication. KMT Youth Work Committee director Liao Yi-hsiu (廖怡琇) even said that participation in the Straits Forum should not be politicized.
However, in his congratulatory message to the forum, Xi encouraged “compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to promote the unification of the motherland.” Wang and Song also touted the importance of upholding the so-called “1992 consensus” and opposing Taiwanese independence. Under the banner of “cross-strait exchanges,” they even claimed that “Taiwan belongs to the entire Chinese people,” a political claim that most Taiwanese would find unacceptable. It was the host of the Straits Forum — the CCP — that gave the forum its political tone.
If the KMT and the TPP could not even refuse to attend what was so obviously a “united front” event that denigrated Taiwanese sovereignty, how could they shamelessly ask the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) not to politicize their actions?
Top KMT and TPP officials have made every effort to cover up their activities that have debased Taiwan while pleasing the CCP with a beautiful package labeled “cross-strait dialogue.” They even sought to legitimize their actions by saying the US government encourages “cross-strait exchanges” and appropriating Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) commitment to protecting Taiwan in a “peaceful way.”
There is no justification for the KMT’s and the TPP’s claims. The public knows that the CCP has shaken cross-strait stability with its repeated military incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. Chinese fleets continue to conduct dangerous operations in the Taiwan Strait, threatening Taiwanese.
Although the KMT and the TPP say they want peace, neither party has ever condemned the CCP’s military actions when they met with Chinese officials. The “dialogue” and “communication” proposed by the KMT and the TPP do not mean much. The only thing the two parties’ officials know is to respectfully listen while CCP officials give them a dressing down. If they could not even utter a word of rebuttal when faced with Chinese officials, the public should not count on them to speak for up for Taiwanese.
Clearly, the CCP’s devotion to and promotion of the Straits Forum was far from cost-effective. The purpose of this so-called “cross-strait exchange” was to carry out Beijing’s “united front” plan. The Mainland Affairs Council already knew what was going on and called it China’s propaganda campaign.
The forum also showed that China’s “united front” agencies have become increasingly desperate as their tactics have failed to fool Taiwanese, who are now cognizant of the CCP’s propaganda and can see through its sugar-coated lies.
Be it the KMT or the TPP, they can no longer play the same old tricks. Taiwanese know what they are doing. On the one hand, they try to win Beijing’s favor and sympathy, and on the other hand, they try to win votes in Taiwan.
The two parties have underestimated the character and intelligence of Taiwanese. As Taiwan’s opposition parties, they have demeaned themselves by giving up their dignity and integrity.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Emma Liu
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS