“Good fences make good neighbors” is a dictum that China seems to disregard, particularly concerning India-China relations. Restoring the pre-Galwan “status quo” at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) is a forthright approach to normalizing India-China relations.
However, it appears unlikely that relations with China are to be normalized in the near future.
Recently, Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said: “Until there is peace and tranquility in border areas, the relationship between the two countries cannot progress.”
Indian leadership and officials are in agreement on this matter. During the Shanghai Cooperation Organization defense ministers’ meeting in New Delhi in late April, Indian Minister of Defence Rajnath Singh reiterated this stance to Chinese Minister of National Defense General Li Shangfu (李尚福). He emphasized that the violation of existing agreements has undermined the fundamental basis of the bilateral relationship.
The unattainability of normalization does not stem from a lack of effort or desire on India’s part, but rather from the absence of proactive steps from China. The border dispute and recurrent standoffs continue to be contentious matters between the two nations. Under the leadership of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India places utmost importance on its territorial integrity and sovereignty. It is working to reinforce its border policy and reshape its outlook on China.
India’s China policy comprises two crucial aspects: Keeping negotiation channels open and highlighting the significance of resolving the border dispute without sidelining it any longer. China, without making enough of an effort to address India’s concerns, is trying to propagate a narrative that the situation at the LAC is already normal and that India is aligning with the US to contain China. China’s refusal to recognize India as an equal partner demonstrates its failure to acknowledge and address India’s legitimate concerns.
Over the past three decades, India has consistently advocated peaceful coexistence with China.
However, China’s notion of coexistence seems to involve India kowtowing to its demands and completely disregarding India’s own territorial integrity.
China is misreading India. Despite being a significant counterweight to China in the region, India has no intention of containing China. Instead, it seeks a return to the pre-Galwan clashes state of relations.
The issue lies not only in the persistence of the border dispute for seven decades, but also in China’s reluctance to pursue a resolution to this longstanding conflict. Instead of providing reassurances, China denies any alteration to the “status quo” at the LAC.
So, what prevents China from normalizing ties with India? Two factors come into play:
First, the Global South seems to exhibit greater receptiveness toward India compared with China. India is increasingly acknowledged as a representative voice of the Global South.
Notably, Papua New Guinean Prime Minister James Marape made a statement during Modi’s visit to the Pacific island nation, recognizing India as “the leader of the Global South.”
China perceives India as undeserving of the recognition it receives on regional and global platforms.
Second, China believes that by perpetuating the border dispute and maintaining a simultaneous two-front threat, it can weaken India and hinder its alignment with the US-led anti-China coalition.
China expects India to accept the recurring standoffs and illegal occupation of territory, withdraw from the US-led anti-China coalition, abandon the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, and maintain neutrality, while China continues supporting Pakistan against India, objects to India’s bid to join the UN Security Council and treats India as an unequal partner.
China offers no solution other than hoping and waiting for India to abandon its policy of prioritizing the resolution of the dispute.
Over the past three years, recognition of China as a primary threat has intensified. In the Indo-Pacific region, China’s assertive behavior has become a unifying force and catalyst for cooperation among like-minded countries.
China’s unwavering stance is a blessing in disguise for India. It has prompted India to re-evaluate its relationship with China and enhance its partnerships with other nations that share similar apprehensions. Consequently, India is playing a pivotal role in shaping the liberal international order, in which China is progressively finding itself marginalized.
China’s inclination to perceive its bilateral relations with India through the prism of the US-China rivalry is fundamentally flawed. This is where China’s approach toward India falters.
However, for India, relations with China are still considered important and substantive, but until China pays sufficient attention to India’s concerns and works to address them, there will be no normalization in ties.
It is crucial for China to refrain from employing the dispute as a means of coercion. Embracing and reconciling with India’s growing stature on regional and global stages is essential to stabilizing and normalizing India-China relations.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations and a post-doctoral fellow at the Taiwan Asia Exchange Foundation.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS