In an article published in the Taipei Times on June 13, former Water Resources Agency section chief Chang Yen-ming (張炎銘) said that people should severely condemn the deed of breaching reservoirs during wartime from the perspective of protecting people’s livelihood and well-being. Based on this, Chang said that Taiwan should abandon the idea that it could, if necessary, attack China’s Three Gorges Dam.
When humanity has reached the free and democratic stage of civilization, it becomes very difficult to justify winning a war through acts of terror that destroy civilian facilities and cause major disasters. This compassionate standpoint is understandable and easy to agree with. The problem is that totalitarian countries remain uncivilized and are under the control of antisocial personalities such as Adolf Hitler.
Such regimes often use propaganda, brainwashing and violence to captivate the population under the pretext of “restoring the glory of the empire” or “the great renewal of the nation.”
While aggressively expanding militarily, they are prepared to do whatever it takes to achieve their goals, even if it means sacrificing the lives of tens or hundreds of millions of people.
For them, bombing power plants and reservoirs takes no more than a flick of the wrist if it serves to paralyze the opposing side. They certainly do not share Chang’s sense of compassion.
With the apparent bombing of the Kakhovka Dam in Ukraine, which Chang cited in his article, foreign news reports have increasingly blamed Russia for its destruction.
We do not need to go far back to learn history’s lessons. To consolidate his personal power, former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched a series of campaigns such as the “Three Red Banners” and the “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution,” which led to the deaths of countless millions of “Chinese compatriots.”
To snuff out the fire of democracy in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, Mao’s indirect successor, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), did not hold back from sending in the army to shoot countless Chinese and crush them with tanks.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who is obsessed with his “Chinese Dream,” is an even more sinister dictator than Mao and Deng. He would certainly show no mercy if he ever attacks Taiwan, and he would not care about Taiwanese who call for peace talks or oppose war.
Although Taiwan might not attack the Three Gorges Dam, it cannot be assumed that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army would not attack the Feitsui Dam (翡翠壩) or the Deji Dam (德基壩).
Military simulations should include a worst-case scenario that account for the huge risk of attacks on infrastructure such as hydroelectric power stations and plans to cope with the problems that would suddenly confront a huge number of disaster victims.
It is an urgent task to prepare reserves of armaments and food, and build solid bunkers in hidden areas. Only by surviving the initial, dangerous attack stage — as Ukraine has done — can Taiwan hope to exert its counteroffensive power and join allies who come to help fight a common enemy.
Jhang Shih-hsien is a former head of the National Palace Museum’s conservation department.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS