Millennials have recently woken up to a tragic reality: We are barreling toward middle age. This transition is marked not only by random shooting pains in our knees, but also by our rise through the corporate ranks and the accompanying desire to utter the phrase “kids these days,” while eye rolling about the antics of Gen Z. In the past two years, it is Gen Z that has become the much-discussed new generation and millennials are throwing around all the go-to insults of them being lazy and entitled.
After the brutal criticism millennials received, we have earned our stripes to engage in the time-honored tradition of disparaging the generation that comes next. Frankly, they are making themselves easy targets with the “quiet quitting” and the “bare minimum Mondays.” Still, we should not discount what they are saying just because of their youth — even if the message is mostly spreading on TikTok.
The way Gen Z demands better boundaries and asks for more at a young age might be an affront to our sensibilities, but each generation brings a fresh perspective to how their labor should be used. Millennials, for example, normalized job hopping when it was clear employers did not fairly compensate or value loyalty.
I am certainly not above throwing a dig at the younger cohort, but I am empathetic to their plight. Millennials came of age in what felt like a broken world. The Great Recession hit as the oldest were 27, which is the same age as the eldest of Gen Z today. The version of the workforce we had been promised when we went to college and took on student loans suddenly evaporated. Underemployment was rampant in our early careers giving rise to side-hustle culture and the gig economy. And by the time we had finally found our financial footing, the housing market was so hot it felt impossible to buy a home.
Gen Z is at the start of their own disillusionment, but they have had significantly more access to information about the plight of their elders thanks to social media and the Internet.
Theirs will be the first generation to have lived their entire lives with the Internet. Going to the library for a school research project is alien to them with the world at their fingertips. They have grown up on social media since before they could even consent to having their images posted. Their world looks nothing like ours, which is why they have completely different desires for the workforce, boundaries, and how to earn a living.
TikTok, Instagram and YouTube have given anyone a platform to be an influencer, which might just be the modern-day entrepreneur. Plus, Gen Z has the cautious optimism that comes with youth. They are establishing their version of cobbling together a comfortable living in an uncertain economy.
The #HustleHarder and #GirlBoss culture that marked the millennial rise in the workplace has largely fallen out of fashion in part due to high rates of burnout and chronic stress. Both terms are often referred to as toxic and frequently said to be an element of corporate, commodified feminism or the worst parts of capitalism.
However, Gen Z seems to be on the cutting edge of their own side hustle. The ability to work remotely opened an opportunity for those with the time, energy and motivation to work two salaried, full-time jobs concurrently. Some leverage time zone differences or focus on positions less likely to be riddled with meetings. The phenomenon, sometimes called polyworking, is different from back in my day when a side hustle meant just a few hours of work on top of a full-time job. You simply could not be in two places at once. The advent of ChatGPT and similar AI could further enhance Gen Z’s knack for polyworking. Just ask the robots to write the first draft of your work while you take a meeting.
It is possible that Gen Z are too early in their careers to worry about the ramifications of being fired from not one, but two full-time jobs. Or perhaps they are already over working for corporate overlords and ready to stick it to them as much and for as long as possible. Or maybe, somewhat unintentionally, they are being hyper-capitalist by taking advantage of demand and looking out for their own bottom line.
Gen Z is also developing a reputation for setting boundaries, pushing back and saying no to managers. It is easy to throw around a term like entitled when a youthful 20-something demands more than you did, but that does not make them wrong. Employers should not have the right to own your time outside of work. Of course, this varies by industry, but far too many industries expect a level of time commitment that is not necessary and not fairly compensated.
Policy changes like salary transparency laws should aid Gen Z in their quest to ask for more, but millennial managers should be part of this fight. We know all too well what it is like to suffer wage stagnation, moving into positions of authority should embolden us to demand more for ourselves and Gen Z. Workplaces do ultimately start to bend toward the next generation. How often were people bringing their dogs to work before millennials started to demand we do so?
I am not so old that I have forgotten how it felt to be disrespected and dismissed early in my career. Coming of age is never an easy transition, but generational warfare in the workplace compounds the problem. It is often the young who drive change because they have a fresh perspective on antiquated behaviors or mistreatment. They have less to lose early in their careers and, therefore, more power to stand up or walk away. Young Boomer and Gen X women paved the way for the access I have received in my career, but I was not wrong to want change and to push back against entrenched behaviors such as glorifying a quick return to the workplace after giving birth or accepting a token woman in a position power as progress. Gen Z is not wrong to want to continue to evolve our society and workforce either.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS