Recently, the media reported on the results of the 12-year compulsory curriculum based on information provided by Chang Yao-wen (張耀文), dean of National Taiwan University’s (NTU) College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. The first group of 12-year curriculum students are about to complete their first year in university.
Chang said that first-year university students at NTU, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and National Sun Yat-sen University are underperforming compared with students in previous years.
Universities have started offering summer courses and online bridging courses to help students with certain subjects, especially calculus and general chemistry. Some professors believe that the new curriculum must be reviewed, and have suggested that the credits required for natural sciences be increased from eight to 18.
Chang has said that high-school teachers cannot cover everything in an eight-credit framework, so students are learning less mathematics and science, while the cram school business has been booming.
High-school courses lay the foundation for calculus and chemistry at university level, but average scores of first-year NTU students have shown a general decline, Chang said.
The average score in calculus of those majoring in science, engineering and social science was lower. For students at NTU’s College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, the score decreased by 8 percent.
However, other universities and academics believe it is too early to judge whether the new curriculum should be held accountable for such declines.
In contemporary education, it is believed that the time invested in studying is not necessarily proportional to the grades received, and that students’ achievements are not a direct result of teaching.
Under the new curriculum, Taiwan’s primary college entrance exam, the General Scholastic Ability Test, is better designed. In the past two years, quality questions were included in mathematics and science. To excel at Chinese, students must acquire a basic knowledge of mathematics and natural sciences, as the questions in the Chinese tests require a fundamental understanding of those disciplines to answer.
That is, the curriculum is designed to break down the boundaries between disciplines, raising the level of students’ competency in not only science and technology, but also languages and arts. Obviously, school teachers at all levels have paid attention to this and endeavored to put it into practice.
Universities and academics should be applauded for placing an emphasis on improving students’ capabilities, but students’ performance should be evaluated long-term, rather than being judged by average scores after only a few semesters. Besides, students’ competence should not be assessed by quantitative data: examination questions for the same course differ from year to year, and so average scores will vary.
The current batch of first-year university students studied under the 12-year curriculum for three years. It is hoped that they will continue to deepen what they have learned in high school and demonstrate their distinct knowledge, temperament and competence as part of the generation participating in the new curriculum.
These students are not only studying for good grades, but to develop their independent thinking. Their language capacity, as well as their ability to innovate and socialize with others, should not be downplayed.
Taiwan should look forward to their achievements in the near future.
Chang Huey-por is former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS