Recently, the media reported on the results of the 12-year compulsory curriculum based on information provided by Chang Yao-wen (張耀文), dean of National Taiwan University’s (NTU) College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. The first group of 12-year curriculum students are about to complete their first year in university.
Chang said that first-year university students at NTU, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and National Sun Yat-sen University are underperforming compared with students in previous years.
Universities have started offering summer courses and online bridging courses to help students with certain subjects, especially calculus and general chemistry. Some professors believe that the new curriculum must be reviewed, and have suggested that the credits required for natural sciences be increased from eight to 18.
Chang has said that high-school teachers cannot cover everything in an eight-credit framework, so students are learning less mathematics and science, while the cram school business has been booming.
High-school courses lay the foundation for calculus and chemistry at university level, but average scores of first-year NTU students have shown a general decline, Chang said.
The average score in calculus of those majoring in science, engineering and social science was lower. For students at NTU’s College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, the score decreased by 8 percent.
However, other universities and academics believe it is too early to judge whether the new curriculum should be held accountable for such declines.
In contemporary education, it is believed that the time invested in studying is not necessarily proportional to the grades received, and that students’ achievements are not a direct result of teaching.
Under the new curriculum, Taiwan’s primary college entrance exam, the General Scholastic Ability Test, is better designed. In the past two years, quality questions were included in mathematics and science. To excel at Chinese, students must acquire a basic knowledge of mathematics and natural sciences, as the questions in the Chinese tests require a fundamental understanding of those disciplines to answer.
That is, the curriculum is designed to break down the boundaries between disciplines, raising the level of students’ competency in not only science and technology, but also languages and arts. Obviously, school teachers at all levels have paid attention to this and endeavored to put it into practice.
Universities and academics should be applauded for placing an emphasis on improving students’ capabilities, but students’ performance should be evaluated long-term, rather than being judged by average scores after only a few semesters. Besides, students’ competence should not be assessed by quantitative data: examination questions for the same course differ from year to year, and so average scores will vary.
The current batch of first-year university students studied under the 12-year curriculum for three years. It is hoped that they will continue to deepen what they have learned in high school and demonstrate their distinct knowledge, temperament and competence as part of the generation participating in the new curriculum.
These students are not only studying for good grades, but to develop their independent thinking. Their language capacity, as well as their ability to innovate and socialize with others, should not be downplayed.
Taiwan should look forward to their achievements in the near future.
Chang Huey-por is former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS