A bipartisan group of US senators on May 4 introduced a bill that authorizes US President Joe Biden’s administration to begin negotiations with Taiwan to conclude a tax agreement, aiming to avoid double taxation and tax evasion in both countries while promoting bilateral economic and trade relations. The Taiwan Tax Agreement Act marks a step in US lawmakers’ efforts to call on Washington to address the tax issue with Taipei, after the US Senate reached a similar resolution in March. In the past few months, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and US Trade Representative Katherine Tai (戴琪) have remarked on a potential trade agreement that would bolster the bilateral economic relationship.
Taiwan has inked 34 income tax agreements with countries including Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the UK, as well as 13 transportation income tax agreements with places such as the US and EU nations. The treaties signed are based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development model, while taking into consideration each country’s political, fiscal, economic and trade situations, the Ministry of Finance said. On the other hand, the US has signed tax agreements with 66 countries, but has no such accord with Taiwan, its eighth-largest trading partner.
For years, Taiwan and the US have failed to achieve a comprehensive and reciprocal tax treaty that includes the reduction or elimination of double taxation on individuals and businesses with operations in each place. Taiwan has been looking to sign a tax treaty with the US for decades, but a major obstacle has been the lack of formal diplomatic relations between the countries, the Ministry of Finance said. This means an agreement would not be regarded as an official treaty, as would normally be the case when concerning Taiwan’s sovereignty, considering China’s claims to the nation.
However, with growing tensions between the US and China since 2018, along with geopolitical developments and the realignment of global supply chains, there is a growing interest in Taiwanese companies investing in the US, as Washington is encouraging domestic manufacturing and job creation with incentives. It is in this context that a US-Taiwan tax agreement would reduce double taxation, and would facilitate more Taiwanese investment in semiconductors and other high-tech goods in the US.
Taiwanese businesses with investments in the US face a corporate income tax rate of 21 percent, and a 30 percent withholding rate on dividends, with the real tax rate climbing as high as 44.7 percent. This has to some extent affected the willingness of Taiwanese firms to invest in the US. If Taipei and Washington can sign a tax agreement, the estimated withholding tax rate could be reduced, and Taiwanese and US businesses can avoid being double-taxed. This would reduce the tax burden and enhance the competitiveness of the investment environment in each place.
A comprehensive tax agreement also includes clauses on exchanges of tax information, dispute resolution and combating tax evasion. For instance, the US government could obtain information on all offshore accounts held by US citizens in Taiwan through the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. If Taipei and Washington sign a tax agreement, Taiwan could also obtain tax information on Taiwanese in the US, as it would have a reciprocity mechanism. Considering the benefits of easing the tax burden and increasing information transparency, a bilateral tax agreement would create a win-win situation for Taiwan and the US.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS