A bipartisan group of US senators on May 4 introduced a bill that authorizes US President Joe Biden’s administration to begin negotiations with Taiwan to conclude a tax agreement, aiming to avoid double taxation and tax evasion in both countries while promoting bilateral economic and trade relations. The Taiwan Tax Agreement Act marks a step in US lawmakers’ efforts to call on Washington to address the tax issue with Taipei, after the US Senate reached a similar resolution in March. In the past few months, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and US Trade Representative Katherine Tai (戴琪) have remarked on a potential trade agreement that would bolster the bilateral economic relationship.
Taiwan has inked 34 income tax agreements with countries including Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the UK, as well as 13 transportation income tax agreements with places such as the US and EU nations. The treaties signed are based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development model, while taking into consideration each country’s political, fiscal, economic and trade situations, the Ministry of Finance said. On the other hand, the US has signed tax agreements with 66 countries, but has no such accord with Taiwan, its eighth-largest trading partner.
For years, Taiwan and the US have failed to achieve a comprehensive and reciprocal tax treaty that includes the reduction or elimination of double taxation on individuals and businesses with operations in each place. Taiwan has been looking to sign a tax treaty with the US for decades, but a major obstacle has been the lack of formal diplomatic relations between the countries, the Ministry of Finance said. This means an agreement would not be regarded as an official treaty, as would normally be the case when concerning Taiwan’s sovereignty, considering China’s claims to the nation.
However, with growing tensions between the US and China since 2018, along with geopolitical developments and the realignment of global supply chains, there is a growing interest in Taiwanese companies investing in the US, as Washington is encouraging domestic manufacturing and job creation with incentives. It is in this context that a US-Taiwan tax agreement would reduce double taxation, and would facilitate more Taiwanese investment in semiconductors and other high-tech goods in the US.
Taiwanese businesses with investments in the US face a corporate income tax rate of 21 percent, and a 30 percent withholding rate on dividends, with the real tax rate climbing as high as 44.7 percent. This has to some extent affected the willingness of Taiwanese firms to invest in the US. If Taipei and Washington can sign a tax agreement, the estimated withholding tax rate could be reduced, and Taiwanese and US businesses can avoid being double-taxed. This would reduce the tax burden and enhance the competitiveness of the investment environment in each place.
A comprehensive tax agreement also includes clauses on exchanges of tax information, dispute resolution and combating tax evasion. For instance, the US government could obtain information on all offshore accounts held by US citizens in Taiwan through the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. If Taipei and Washington sign a tax agreement, Taiwan could also obtain tax information on Taiwanese in the US, as it would have a reciprocity mechanism. Considering the benefits of easing the tax burden and increasing information transparency, a bilateral tax agreement would create a win-win situation for Taiwan and the US.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS