A bipartisan group of US senators on May 4 introduced a bill that authorizes US President Joe Biden’s administration to begin negotiations with Taiwan to conclude a tax agreement, aiming to avoid double taxation and tax evasion in both countries while promoting bilateral economic and trade relations. The Taiwan Tax Agreement Act marks a step in US lawmakers’ efforts to call on Washington to address the tax issue with Taipei, after the US Senate reached a similar resolution in March. In the past few months, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and US Trade Representative Katherine Tai (戴琪) have remarked on a potential trade agreement that would bolster the bilateral economic relationship.
Taiwan has inked 34 income tax agreements with countries including Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the UK, as well as 13 transportation income tax agreements with places such as the US and EU nations. The treaties signed are based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development model, while taking into consideration each country’s political, fiscal, economic and trade situations, the Ministry of Finance said. On the other hand, the US has signed tax agreements with 66 countries, but has no such accord with Taiwan, its eighth-largest trading partner.
For years, Taiwan and the US have failed to achieve a comprehensive and reciprocal tax treaty that includes the reduction or elimination of double taxation on individuals and businesses with operations in each place. Taiwan has been looking to sign a tax treaty with the US for decades, but a major obstacle has been the lack of formal diplomatic relations between the countries, the Ministry of Finance said. This means an agreement would not be regarded as an official treaty, as would normally be the case when concerning Taiwan’s sovereignty, considering China’s claims to the nation.
However, with growing tensions between the US and China since 2018, along with geopolitical developments and the realignment of global supply chains, there is a growing interest in Taiwanese companies investing in the US, as Washington is encouraging domestic manufacturing and job creation with incentives. It is in this context that a US-Taiwan tax agreement would reduce double taxation, and would facilitate more Taiwanese investment in semiconductors and other high-tech goods in the US.
Taiwanese businesses with investments in the US face a corporate income tax rate of 21 percent, and a 30 percent withholding rate on dividends, with the real tax rate climbing as high as 44.7 percent. This has to some extent affected the willingness of Taiwanese firms to invest in the US. If Taipei and Washington can sign a tax agreement, the estimated withholding tax rate could be reduced, and Taiwanese and US businesses can avoid being double-taxed. This would reduce the tax burden and enhance the competitiveness of the investment environment in each place.
A comprehensive tax agreement also includes clauses on exchanges of tax information, dispute resolution and combating tax evasion. For instance, the US government could obtain information on all offshore accounts held by US citizens in Taiwan through the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. If Taipei and Washington sign a tax agreement, Taiwan could also obtain tax information on Taiwanese in the US, as it would have a reciprocity mechanism. Considering the benefits of easing the tax burden and increasing information transparency, a bilateral tax agreement would create a win-win situation for Taiwan and the US.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS