A bipartisan group of US senators on May 4 introduced a bill that authorizes US President Joe Biden’s administration to begin negotiations with Taiwan to conclude a tax agreement, aiming to avoid double taxation and tax evasion in both countries while promoting bilateral economic and trade relations. The Taiwan Tax Agreement Act marks a step in US lawmakers’ efforts to call on Washington to address the tax issue with Taipei, after the US Senate reached a similar resolution in March. In the past few months, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and US Trade Representative Katherine Tai (戴琪) have remarked on a potential trade agreement that would bolster the bilateral economic relationship.
Taiwan has inked 34 income tax agreements with countries including Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the UK, as well as 13 transportation income tax agreements with places such as the US and EU nations. The treaties signed are based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development model, while taking into consideration each country’s political, fiscal, economic and trade situations, the Ministry of Finance said. On the other hand, the US has signed tax agreements with 66 countries, but has no such accord with Taiwan, its eighth-largest trading partner.
For years, Taiwan and the US have failed to achieve a comprehensive and reciprocal tax treaty that includes the reduction or elimination of double taxation on individuals and businesses with operations in each place. Taiwan has been looking to sign a tax treaty with the US for decades, but a major obstacle has been the lack of formal diplomatic relations between the countries, the Ministry of Finance said. This means an agreement would not be regarded as an official treaty, as would normally be the case when concerning Taiwan’s sovereignty, considering China’s claims to the nation.
However, with growing tensions between the US and China since 2018, along with geopolitical developments and the realignment of global supply chains, there is a growing interest in Taiwanese companies investing in the US, as Washington is encouraging domestic manufacturing and job creation with incentives. It is in this context that a US-Taiwan tax agreement would reduce double taxation, and would facilitate more Taiwanese investment in semiconductors and other high-tech goods in the US.
Taiwanese businesses with investments in the US face a corporate income tax rate of 21 percent, and a 30 percent withholding rate on dividends, with the real tax rate climbing as high as 44.7 percent. This has to some extent affected the willingness of Taiwanese firms to invest in the US. If Taipei and Washington can sign a tax agreement, the estimated withholding tax rate could be reduced, and Taiwanese and US businesses can avoid being double-taxed. This would reduce the tax burden and enhance the competitiveness of the investment environment in each place.
A comprehensive tax agreement also includes clauses on exchanges of tax information, dispute resolution and combating tax evasion. For instance, the US government could obtain information on all offshore accounts held by US citizens in Taiwan through the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. If Taipei and Washington sign a tax agreement, Taiwan could also obtain tax information on Taiwanese in the US, as it would have a reciprocity mechanism. Considering the benefits of easing the tax burden and increasing information transparency, a bilateral tax agreement would create a win-win situation for Taiwan and the US.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS