Fashion and its changing shapes have long stirred controversy. Once it was women in pants who drew a frenzied backlash. Today it is the choices of people who identify as nonbinary, and challenge the norm in what they choose to wear and how they want to shop.
Amid the furor, a few — too few — mainstream brands have had the foresight to design clothes for people who do not sit neatly in the gender binary, and for an expanding group of young shoppers who prefer to dress across gender lines. The communities these companies see have always existed, even when they were not acknowledged, and now their choices are helping reinvent how people think about everyday dressing.
Sped up by social media and the influence of international celebrities such as Harry Styles, nonbinary fashion is becoming more prevalent and driving retailers to figure out how to catch up.
Illustration: Mountain People
Women first started wearing pants regularly in the early 20th century to widespread condemnation. Those who wore bloomers (a precursor to pants) and trousers came to represent a larger cultural shift called “bloomerism,” which described women engaging in more masculine pastimes such as drinking, smoking and gambling.
The threat became so overwhelming that cities passed laws banning women from wearing pants. The fear was that if women wore pants, what would be next? Men wearing dresses while they are bossed around by their wives? What even is a man if women can wear pants?
Sound familiar? History suggests retailers that cave to backward-looking ideals risk falling behind those that see nonbinary shoppers are a deeply rooted part of the consumer landscape. The community at 1.2 million might appear niche, but brands with gender neutral clothing are marketing to the entire LGBTQ population.
Building a reputation for inclusivity also appeals to a broader segment of young shoppers, who seek out such brands and are also more likely to shop outside their gender identity. While much of mainstream retail has ignored these shifts, companies such as Target, Nordstrom, Uniqlo and Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) are slowly changing that, providing a model for the way forward.
That path runs through the culture wars. Republicans have this year pushed through dozens of state bills that do everything from rolling back gender-affirming healthcare to banning transgender girls in sports. Similar to a century ago, how people dress is also under attack. Several states have introduced — and Tennessee has passed — laws criminalizing drag performances. The Texas Department of Agriculture last month started requiring staff to dress “in a manner consistent with their biological gender.”
Cultural change often precedes political change, and that can already be seen in how retail racks are starting to shift as people embrace their individual gender identities.
For many nonbinary people, clothes are more than a necessity or self-expression — they are a kind of armor. For most people outfits to mark the first day of work or a first date are often carefully selected to exude confidence. For a community whose humanity is under threat, clothing offers protection and affirmation.
What better feeling than when a pair of jeans hangs from your hips in just the right way or a loose crop top flutters at your waist? For nonbinary people, that feeling is part of their survival kit, MI Leggett, founder of the genderless and sustainable fashion brand Official Rebrand, told me.
Leggett’s Official Rebrand, which incorporated in 2017, redesigns excess and defective stock from brands into new pieces that do not fall into the gender binary. Some clothes have explicit messages such as “God is trans,” while others are designed without a particular feminine or masculine silhouette to show gender’s expansiveness, said Leggett, who uses they and he pronouns.
They said that wearing clothes that affirm their gender, makes them feel like “a much better version of myself.”
Yet shopping as someone who does not squarely fit into the gender binary can be stressful. At best, shoppers zigzag across departments from men’s clothing to women’s and even children’s, looking for something that fits their bodies and tastes. Once they are ready with a stack of options, they typically have to choose between men’s and women’s fitting rooms, and risk catching confused looks or someone telling them they are in the wrong dressing room. Often they leave exhausted, disheveled and without a purchase.
Shopping online does not provide much relief when it comes to fit and style either. This is despite that luxury designers have experimented with unisex fashion for decades. In the late 1960s, Parisian designers such as Pierre Cardin and Andre Courreges, inspired by the Space Age, designed clothing pieces with simple silhouettes.
As recently as 2020, Marc Jacobs introduced a polysexual collection of clothing for “girls who are boys and boys who are girls [and] those who are neither.” From Stella McCartney to Gucci, high-end companies have rolled out lines that lie outside of the gender binary.
The irony of luxury companies conceptualizing gender neutral clothing is that LGBTQ people face higher rates of poverty, unemployment and homelessness. They often have trouble finding work, and many find stable income in service jobs at restaurants, cleaning companies or gig work.
So when companies such as Target or H&M release gender neutral lines, it helps make shopping much more affordable. Target’s Pride Collection comes out once a year, but features gender inclusive pieces that can be worn any time, including binders, an undergarment people use over their chest for a flatter look. H&M’s Unisex store features T-shirts and hoodies that are not designed for a particular gender. It is the same for its Denim United line. PacSun’s 2021 The Colour Range was a collection “curated without a specific gender in mind.”
Still, some of these lines have drawn critiques from LGBTQ people. Target revamped its Pride collection with several LGBTQ designers after its 2021 edition was called out of touch, performative and confusing.
Few of these moves have come without homophobic and transphobic backlash. When Target introduced a gender neutral kids clothing line, people vowed to boycott the company. Some shoppers at H&M have railed against its move to unisex fitting rooms. The risk of rolling out such lines is losing some customers or facing a public relations nightmare — something the maker of Bud Light experienced after a collaboration with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
However, Nora Kleinewillinghoefer, an associate partner in the consumer practice of consulting firm Kearney, said that successful brands are blending gender neutral clothing into their stores so that they are available for anyone, and building it into their larger strategy. Organizing stores around product categories (rather than gender) can help normalize gender neutrality.
Nonbinary people have always found a way to shop, whether it is weaving together a look using clothes from men’s and women’s departments or frequenting thrift stores where the gender binary is less enforced. Sports retailers such as Nike have become mainstays in many closets in part because they do not cater to one gender over another. You would be hard pressed to find a nonbinary person without a Nike sports bra in their drawer.
The question is which are the next big brands that will be sitting alongside it.
Leticia Miranda is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering consumer goods and the retail industry. She was previously a business reporter at NBC News and a retail reporter at BuzzFeed News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
RSS