In the 1930s, Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini met several times in each other’s countries to pledge their unified opposition to the post-World War I liberal international order. The two dictators committed Nazi Germany and fascist Italy to a “common destiny”: to create “a new order” in Europe, an “axis” around which the fate of the continent would revolve.
Undeterred by the West, they unleashed the horrors of World War II.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), today’s most threatening world leaders, have also engaged in a series of exchange visits, the latest of which was last month with Xi’s visit to Moscow.
It was a fitting bookend to Putin’s meeting with Xi at the opening of the Beijing Olympics, where the two dictators announced their “no-limits strategic partnership,” and effectively declared another cold war against the US and its democratic allies and partners.
Like Hitler and Mussolini almost a century ago, Putin and Xi detest the rules-based international system that has brought stability, peace and economic progress to much of the world.
However, the system also espouses a regime of democracy and human rights that is anathema to totalitarian despots who lust for total power over repressed populations and seek to extend their control over the people of neighboring countries.
Within weeks of their statement of mutual support in February last year, Putin unleashed the largest, most destructive war in Europe since Hitler’s rampages across the continent, repeating what the Nuremberg Tribunal labeled as Nazi Germany’s first war crime: a war of aggression.
In the course of Russia’s latest aggression — after the invasions of Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014 — Putin’s forces have perpetrated daily war crimes and crimes against humanity: indiscriminate killing of civilians; torture, rape and kidnapping of women and children; and targeted bombings of hospitals, schools, theaters, government buildings, crops, energy infrastructure, etc.
For those and other atrocities, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine in October last year reported to the UN General Assembly that a range of war crimes and violations of human rights and international humanitarian law had been committed in areas of Ukraine occupied by Russian forces.
“The impact of these violations on the civilian population in Ukraine is immense. The loss of lives is in the thousands. The destruction of infrastructure is devastating,” it said.
The situation has only grown worse in the six months since the report.
Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Levova-Belova, his commissioner for children’s rights in Russia, for the crimes of kidnapping Ukrainian children and deporting them to Russia for adoption, where forced “Russification” can be carried out unseen by the outside world.
It is Putin’s own version of cultural genocide.
To show his disdain for the findings by impartial international observers, Putin immediately paid a visit to the site that endured the first of his crimes against a civilian population and infrastructure: Mariupol in southern Ukraine.
Xi’s visit to Moscow last month was intended to lend political and “moral” support to Putin, the accused war criminal, who has become an international pariah for the extensive atrocities committed by his forces in Ukraine.
It should be no surprise that Xi does not recoil at smiling and shaking hands with this mass murderer.
After all, Xi heads a communist regime that systematically subjugates and imprisons Uighurs in Xinjiang — seizing the men and impressing them into forced labor, dispatching Chinese soldiers to cohabit with the women and produce “Sinicized” babies, desecrating their families and their faith, attempting to erase every vestige of Uighur or Muslim identity.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights issued a report in August last year finding “allegations of patterns of torture, or ill-treatment, including forced medical treatment and adverse conditions of detention, are credible, as are allegations of individual incidents of sexual and gender-based violence.”
It concluded that “genocide and crimes against humanity” took place over the course of the past year.
Then-US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, speaking for the administration of then-US president Donald Trump in 2021, condemned the “decades-long campaign of repression against Uighur Muslims and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups, including ethnic Kazakhs and ethnic Kyrgyz.”
The statement detailed the abuses and their sinister purpose: “Their morally repugnant, wholesale policies, practices and abuses are designed systematically to discriminate against and surveil ethnic Uighurs as a unique demographic and ethnic group, restrict their freedom to travel, emigrate and attend schools, and deny other basic human rights of assembly, speech and worship,” Pompeo said.
The People’s Republic of China “authorities have conducted forced sterilizations and abortions on Uighur women, coerced them to marry non-Uighurs and separated Uighur children from their families,” he said.
Pompeo invoked the Nazi precedent against Xi’s regime, saying: “The Nuremberg Tribunals at the end of World War II prosecuted perpetrators for crimes against humanity, the same crimes being perpetrated in Xinjiang.”
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken of the administration of US President Joe Biden has criticized Beijing’s obstruction of a fair investigation by the UN human rights commissioner and declared his own finding that “genocide and crimes against humanity are ongoing” in Xinjiang.
Like Hitler and Mussolini, Putin and Xi are kindred spirits in brutality and the inhuman treatment of people under their control.
Their meeting in Moscow could well be called the “genocide summit.”
Aside from “sanitizing” Putin and ending his near-total international isolation, Xi could demonstrate more overt support for his war in Ukraine by supplying “lethal” weapons, some observers worry.
China has already significantly softened the impact of Western sanctions on Russia, by increasing its purchase of Russian oil and gas by orders of magnitude, a circumvention that the West tolerates.
Washington and other capitals also indulge China’s supply of small arms and dual-use technology that can be integrated into Russia’s military arsenal.
Those willing oversights and the deliberate slow-walking of more potent weapons systems to Ukraine inexcusably prolong the war and Ukraine’s suffering.
It also extends the potential drain of Western weapons, resources and attention away from the Indo-Pacific arena, where China awaits the opportunity to pounce on Taiwan, Japan and other US allies and partners.
However, the answer to that challenge is not to deprive Ukraine of all it needs, as fast as it needs it, to defeat Russia.
Instead, the Biden administration should make explicit and official what the president has casually said four times — that the US will directly come to Taiwan’s defense.
Scrapping the longstanding policy of strategic ambiguity is the safest way to deter China’s aggression.
If Hitler and Mussolini — and Putin — had known the fate that awaited them, they might well have tamed their aggressive urges.
Xi still has time to learn that lesson, if a resolute West is prepared to teach it.
Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the US secretary of defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He served in the Pentagon when Vladimir Putin invaded Georgia, and was involved in Department of Defense discussions about the US’ response. Follow him on Twitter @BoscoJosephA.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS