Nine years have passed since March 30, 2014, when half a million people gathered on Taipei’s Ketagalan Boulevard to protest against the Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services. While originally intended to express concern about the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government throwing Taiwan’s door wide open to China, the rally also voiced widespread disapproval of police’s bloody dispersal of protesters occupying part of the Executive Yuan, which had happened one week earlier, in the early hours of March 24.
Unfortunately, then-premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and other government officials who instigated the police deployment have never been called to account, and neither have the police officers who acted violently, but who, according to the police, “could not be identified.”
It is therefore welcome news that on March 23, nine years after the events, the Control Yuan proposed a set of corrective measures to the Executive Yuan, the Ministry of the Interior, the National Police Agency, the Taipei City Police Department and the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office, telling them to review their actions and make improvements. For the victims of that night’s police violence, this belated justice is a small victory, but also a great one.
The damage that was done that night can hardly be erased. It came as a shock that police methods characteristic of the authoritarian era could still be employed in a free and democratic Taiwan. Nonetheless, through many years of litigation and the Control Yuan’s corrective measures, we have told the public that when police face a crowd of protesters employing civil disobedience, it is wrong to attack them and treat them in a vindictive manner.
The Control Yuan’s decision also gives another slap in the face to Ma and Jiang for saying that they supported police’s eviction of the student protesters and that police got the crowd to leave by just “patting them on the shoulder.”
In recent years, China’s hostility to Taiwan has been going from bad to worse. Its use of the Internet and economic, political, military and other means to threaten Taiwan has become commonplace. Were it not for the Sunflower movement, would the nation have been lured into a trap set by China? What about Ma, who is attracting attention with his visit to China? Does he still think that signing the service trade agreement with China was the right thing to do?
Pan Kuan is a New Taipei City resident who took part in the 2014 Sunflower movement.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
RSS