On Dec. 27 last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) announced that conscription would be restored to one year for male Taiwanese born after Jan. 1, 2005. The reform won the support of the majority of citizens, while the US and Japan indicated approval of Taiwan’s resolve to boost its self-defense and deterrence capabilities.
The reform included bolstering training, raising wages for conscripts, recognizing mandatory service under the labor pension system and studying how the education system can be made more flexible to help young men effectively use their time and build careers.
The training program’s content would also be upgraded to include the use of drones, Stinger, Javelin and Kestrel missiles, and other new weapons to meet the needs of modern warfare.
This paradigm shift is laudable, but the mainstay of the policy seems to be centered on hard military skills.
Modern warfare is no longer restricted to two armies clashing. The possession of advanced weapons is a prerequisite, but warfare has become more complex, all-encompassing and diverse. Combat has spilled over from military and political warfare to “smokeless battlefields” such as the economy, finance, trade, diplomacy, public opinion, cognitive warfare, information, cyber and technology.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has shown that advances in technology have ushered in a new type of warfare, and reforms should take that into account.
Cyberattacks are easy to launch, but difficult to defend. As it takes time to train professionals, the government should recruit conscripts learned in computer science for cyberwarfare training and make them members of information security teams. They could monitor cyberattacks from China, develop cyberwarfare tools, create a training environment for information security, help the public sector with information security and work with local governments to promote information on security.
As cognitive warfare is the extension of psychological warfare and political warfare beyond the battlefield, it can help boost the morale of Taiwanese.
However, if the enemy launches a cognitive attack and Taiwan does not defend it properly, there could be conflict and social unrest that could lead to social division, civil dysfunction and a stagnation of industrial development.
Similarly, the government could enlist conscripts with cognitive warfare-related backgrounds for additional training, establish a “myth-busting” team to counter China’s cognitive attacks and work with civic groups to design compelling, easy-to-follow activities to raise the public’s awareness about cognitive warfare and media literacy to spot disinformation.
Aside from those soft military skills, the government could also take other fields into account, such as electronic warfare, data analysis and big data, combined warfare with artificial intelligence, reinforcement of basic infrastructure and defense of combat supplies, natural resources, and transport systems.
As soft military skills are different from those needed in field operations, the government might have to decrease the intensity of physical training.
Tsai said that “under this new system, the one year spent in the military will not be wasted.”
Making the proposed changes, this goal can be reached. After completing service, the skills acquired in the military can turn conscripts into much sought-after talents, leaders in civic military groups or elites in the all-out defense system. The government must look into the research, planning and implementation of soft skills needed in various battlefield scenarios.
Eugene Yeh is a former director-general of the National Center for High-performance Computing.
Translated by Rita Wang
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS