On March 27, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology’s Agency for Cultural Affairs is to move from Tokyo to Kyoto. Initially set in March 2016, the plan attracted a lot of public interest.
This agency is a small organization consisting of only 300 personnel with an annual budget of about ¥$100 billion (US$733 million).
Given that Japan’s political climate has always been conservative, it requires a strong will to move away from “Tokyo centralization.”
Likewise, Taiwan faces the issue of “northern Taiwan centralization,” alongside concerns over regional development.
The registered population in Taipei, New Taipei City, Taoyuan and Keelung is 9 million people, while the capital is the epicenter of economic growth and the hub of government agencies.
Metropolitan centralization should be considered an abnormal phenomenon and should be fixed for a country to develop evenly.
Relocating government agencies from the capital to other areas in no simple task, but it should be relatively feasible when it comes to deciding on locations for newly established ones.
It is regrettable that the Ministry of Digital Affairs, which was originally proposed to be headquartered in southern Taiwan, ended up in Taipei. It could have been placed in the south while carrying out its mandate nationwide, making the most of its digital competence.
A basic principle of risk diversification is to never put all your eggs in one basket. Can the Ministry of Culture move to Tainan? Can the Coast Guard Administration return to Kaohsiung under the Ocean Affairs Council?
Many government agencies need not be housed in Taipei. Agencies of the Council of Agriculture, including the Agriculture and Food Agency, Fisheries Agency and Forestry Bureau, could be relocated closer to mountains or the coast.
With elections next year, parties should consider these issues when drafting their agendas for presidential and legislative candidates.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of the Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the