Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who has long flirted with the idea of standing for president, recently said that when he visited temples during the Lunar New Year, he was bequeathed the divine consent of sea goddess Matsu (媽祖) and god of war Guan Gong (關公) to run for highest office.
His claim was reminiscent of his talk during the 2020 presidential election, when Gou said that Matsu had come to him in a dream, asking him to enter the race.
Article 7 of the Constitution protects people’s right to hold religious beliefs, but it also ensures that Taiwan is upheld by a modern democratic system that keeps religion separate from politics.
However, Matsu and Guan Gong have a large number of believers in Taiwan, and therefore politicians cannot resist participating in religious events to boost their popularity.
Gou’s “divine” ploys are anachronistic and obsolete. Nobody buys into the feudal idea of the “divine right of kings” in this day and age.
To find a pretext for his personal ambition, Gou’s maneuvers only exploit the silence of divine deities and their influence on public belief. This is not only sacrilege, it is an affront to the spirit of democracy by placing the selection of presidents on a par with the election of cult leaders and con artists.
Democracy is built on the principle of disenchantment, by replacing mysticism and apotheosis with democratic elections, human rights and the rule of law. Nevertheless, Gou likely cannot understand this, as he supports the concept that “democracy cannot put food on the table.”
Gou acquired COVID-19 vaccines for the nation as a way to purchase political capital and underpin his bid for the presidency. He has gone further, using religion as a bargaining chip. It is ludicrous.
If Gou needs the consent of deities to run for president, might he cast divination blocks to manage state affairs if he is elected?
Lai Yen-cheng is a doctoral candidate at National Yangming Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Rita Wang
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS