Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who has long flirted with the idea of standing for president, recently said that when he visited temples during the Lunar New Year, he was bequeathed the divine consent of sea goddess Matsu (媽祖) and god of war Guan Gong (關公) to run for highest office.
His claim was reminiscent of his talk during the 2020 presidential election, when Gou said that Matsu had come to him in a dream, asking him to enter the race.
Article 7 of the Constitution protects people’s right to hold religious beliefs, but it also ensures that Taiwan is upheld by a modern democratic system that keeps religion separate from politics.
However, Matsu and Guan Gong have a large number of believers in Taiwan, and therefore politicians cannot resist participating in religious events to boost their popularity.
Gou’s “divine” ploys are anachronistic and obsolete. Nobody buys into the feudal idea of the “divine right of kings” in this day and age.
To find a pretext for his personal ambition, Gou’s maneuvers only exploit the silence of divine deities and their influence on public belief. This is not only sacrilege, it is an affront to the spirit of democracy by placing the selection of presidents on a par with the election of cult leaders and con artists.
Democracy is built on the principle of disenchantment, by replacing mysticism and apotheosis with democratic elections, human rights and the rule of law. Nevertheless, Gou likely cannot understand this, as he supports the concept that “democracy cannot put food on the table.”
Gou acquired COVID-19 vaccines for the nation as a way to purchase political capital and underpin his bid for the presidency. He has gone further, using religion as a bargaining chip. It is ludicrous.
If Gou needs the consent of deities to run for president, might he cast divination blocks to manage state affairs if he is elected?
Lai Yen-cheng is a doctoral candidate at National Yangming Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Rita Wang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS