On April 22, 2021, music teacher Chan Hui-ling (詹慧玲) was stopped and questioned in Taoyuan’s Jhongli District (中壢) by a police officer, surnamed Yeh (葉). When she refused to cooperate, she was thrown to the ground and arrested for obstructing an officer in carrying out their duties.
Chan filed a complaint against the officer, but the Taoyuan District Prosecutors’ Office declined to press charges. After Chan applied for a reconsideration, the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office ordered local authorities to conduct a second review. Yeh was found guilty in the first trial of coercion by a public official and was sentenced to four months in jail, in addition to offenses against personal freedom by a public official, for which he received a further six months.
The case highlights the major problem with spot checks by police.
Police conduct spot checks to maintain social order — not for criminal investigations. As such, spot checks do not involve arrest or search warrants, and are not subject to stringent oversight. Many years ago, the only legal basis for spot checks by police was Article 11 of the Police Duty Act (警察勤務條例), which demonstrates the dearth of attention given to spot checks. It was not until the passage of the 2003 Police Power Exercise Act (警察職權行使法), following the grand justices’ issuance of Interpretation No. 535 in 2001, that clearer legal norms were laid for spot checks.
According to Interpretation No. 535, police cannot conduct arbitrary or random inspections regardless of time, location or individuals. There must be reasonable doubt that shows the person poses a risk to endangering public safety or order.
Furthermore, before carrying out a spot check, there must be reasonable grounds to believe the person constitutes a hazard or will cause a hazard. This principle is also laid out in the first item of Article 6 of the Police Power Exercise Act.
Based on Paragraph 1, Article 4 of the same act, when initiating a stop-and-check, police shall present their credentials showing their identity and state their intent. Furthermore, Paragraph 1, Article 3 of the same act states that the principle of proportionality must be observed.
If an officer were to conduct a spot check without following legal procedures — for example, basing their action on subjective feelings, such as they think the target is a stranger or acting strangely — did not inform the other person why they were targeted, or breached the principle of proportionality, etc., they have no legal basis on which to conduct the check. In such cases, based on Paragraph 2, Article 4 of the Police Power Exercise Act, people have the right to refuse to cooperate.
Since the crime of obstructing an officer in discharge of their duties as stated in Paragraph 1, Article 135 of the Criminal Code assumes that civil servants perform their duties in accordance with the law, resisting illegal checks is a legitimate self-defense, and it is not considered obstructing an officer in carrying out their duties. It is the police who might be breaking the law if they were to take a person into custody without proper authority, through coercion or after an illegal search.
Most people would feel intimidated or unsure of what the legal consequences would be if they refused to cooperate. They could take legal action after the incident, but by that time it would be difficult to collect evidence. It is rare for somebody to stand up for their rights in the manner like Chan did, leading to the prosecution of a police officer.
As the Police Power Exercise Act has been in force for nearly 20 years, aside from reviewing and amending legislation, police must strive to comply with due process and protect people’s rights when conducting random inspections.
Wu Ching-chin is a law professor at Aletheia University and director of the university’s Research Center for Criminal Law.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from