Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) last month published a two-volume memoir in which he called “on the mainland to face up to the existence of the government of the Republic of China [ROC],” adding that “only with such political mutual trust can cross-strait dialogue begin.”
The memoir quickly drew a tide of criticism from Chinese media such as Web sites Straits Express and NetEase, and the Fujian Daily, which described Lien’s emphasis on the ROC as being almost identical to the “two-state theory” proposed by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), and President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) statement that neither side of the Taiwan Strait should be subordinate to the other.
Chinese media said that when Lien made his “icebreaker trip” to China in 2005, he received a grand reception and a warm welcome from Chinese.
They said that during his visit he only mentioned the ROC once, when he said that Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) had led the national revolution that overthrew the Qing Dynasty and established the first democratic republic in Asia — the ROC.
Now that Lien is too old to travel to China, he has “stopped pretending,” which shows him to be fickle and untrustworthy, they said.
However, Lien visited China several times after 2005 and met with Chinese Communist Party leaders, including then-Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平). In Taiwan, Lien’s strong advocacy of cross-strait exchanges has led to him being regarded as “pro-China,” so why is he being castigated for calling on China to face up to the ROC’s existence?
It is because China denies that the ROC lives on in Taiwan proper, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, even after the People’s Republic of China was established in 1949. On Jan. 2, 2019, Xi equated the so-called “1992 consensus” with “national unification” and identified the means to achieve it as “one country, two systems,” which would turn Taiwan into a “special administrative region” like Hong Kong and Macau.
When Xi’s ally Song Tao (宋濤) was appointed director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office in December last year, he said that he would draw up a “two systems plan for Taiwan” this year.
That is why China regards Lien’s emphasis on the ROC as “implicit Taiwan independence.” No wonder KMT politicians often talk about the ROC when they are in Taiwan, but never dare to mention it when they are in China.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said at a meeting of the party’s Central Standing Committee on Jan. 18 that “the public as a whole wants to maintain ... the peaceful and stable status quo of the Republic of China.”
Chu and the KMT keep saying the government should restart cross-strait dialogue, but even KMT elder statesman Lien says that if China does not face up to the ROC’s existence, there will be no political trust between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and no hope of launching talks. Lien’s remarks should be a wake-up call for Chu and the KMT.
Fan Shih-ping is a professor in National Taiwan Normal University’s Graduate Institute of Political Science.
Translated by Julian Clegg
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS