To boost Taiwan’s international competitiveness, the government has launched a “bilingual nation” policy, pledging to achieve this goal by 2030. After the new Cabinet takes shape, it should promptly review the implementation of the policy, and then make adjustments if needed.
How can Taiwanese’s English be improved? The answer is simple: Better English education would be a start. Oddly, many universities and even the College Entrance Examination Center (CEEC) are doing the opposite at the moment, taking Taiwan further away from becoming a “bilingual nation.”
The CEEC, for example, which holds the General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT) in January as well as the Advanced Subjects Test (AST) in July every year, last year removed English as a subject from the AST. Such assessment without the English subject is certainly unfavorable to the bilingual policy. The removal of English has misled the public into believing that English is no longer valued and that they should not take it seriously.
Soon after the AST abandoned English, as many as 104 university departments announced that they would no longer take the results of the GSAT’s English subject as a criterion for admission starting this year, hoping to attract freshmen by dumping English amid the “low-birthrate tsunami” hitting Taiwan. Due to this trend, many in Taiwan seem to believe that English-related departments at universities are of limited use, leading to a plunge in enrollment.
Meanwhile, some universities have been saving personnel costs by turning English courses from compulsory to elective or cutting them extensively. This means that college students do not need to learn English anymore. There are also universities that have been cheating the Ministry of Education out of its grants for “EMI” (English-medium instruction) courses by fabricating various programs, and schools that have been overdoing EMI by teaching Chinese in English only, departing from the original intention of the bilingual policy.
As for elementary and high schools, the biggest challenges remain the insufficiency in English class hours, the shortage of competent English teachers and the rigidity of teaching methods.
To enhance the public’s English skills, the Cabinet should first instruct the CECC to resume the AST’s English subject, and encourage universities to take the test results of the English subject as a criterion for admission, which would help reverse people’s impression that English is of little importance.
Next, it should prioritize pushing every university to provide quality English courses, rather than teaching all academic subjects in English only. Offering classes in English is not a bad idea, but it should be accomplished gradually, and with a strict review mechanism for the ministry’s EMI grants.
Finally, schools at all levels should increase the number of English courses, provide teacher training, and adopt pragmatic materials and flexible teaching methods simultaneously, such as using multimedia to guide students to communicate in English in the real world.
Taiwan’s average Test of English for International Communication score of 565 in 2021 lagged far behind the scores of its neighbors such as Japan (574), South Korea (679) and Malaysia (681), showing that improving Taiwanese’s English skills is necessary.
However, the government seems to have got the focus wrong, working hard to promote EMI courses while sitting back and watching the CEEC remove English as a subject and universities cut English courses. As its bilingual policy fails to clarify the order of priority, it can hardly tackle the problems at the root.
Eddy Chang is a university assistant professor of English.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS