As mayor of the Palestinian city of Bethlehem, I have the privilege of lighting the Christmas tree in Manger Square and attending midnight mass at one of the world’s oldest churches, built in the fourth century by the Byzantine Empress Helena.
However, my most important duty is to help give people faith and encouragement. When I lit the Christmas tree on Dec. 3, I expressed my hope that the light would radiate to the world our desire for peace, and everyone prayed that Christmas would fulfill its promise and bring people together.
Bringing people together has two meanings for Palestinians living under occupation. It can mean the togetherness of time shared with friends and relatives, but as the mayor of the city where it all began for Christians 2,000 years ago, I must think of the larger Palestinian family.
As Palestinians have been living for decades under occupation, we cannot enjoy the sense of togetherness that all people want during their holidays, particularly the religious ones. Our people in Gaza cannot come freely to Bethlehem, and our brothers and sisters in Jordan and other countries cannot easily obtain visas from an occupying power that applies exaggerated entry restrictions.
Citizens of other Middle East countries, such as Lebanon and Syria, which have no peace agreement with Israel, have no chance at all.
That a Palestinian Christian like me, or a Christian living in a nearby Arab country, cannot simply come to Bethlehem for Christmas should be unacceptable to everyone — as should the 8m-high wall that still encircles the city, despite being declared illegal by the International Court of Justice in 2004. This wall is a constant reminder of separation rather than togetherness.
This year marks 150 years since the municipality of Bethlehem was established. Under Palestinian Authority law, a Christian Arab serves as mayor here and in similar Palestinian cities, but the challenge of keeping Christian Arabs in Palestine has become more difficult because of the occupation.
While many Palestinians suffer under foreign military rule and wish that they could leave, Palestinian Christians are leaving in larger numbers simply because they have connections with the wider world through churches and the tourism business.
Bethlehem’s population has grown over the years, and so has the number of hotel rooms — something unavailable to Mary and Joseph 2,000 years ago.
However, the growth of the population and tourist accommodation has been restricted by the wall Israel built on Palestinian land, and by the occupiers’ refusal to allow Bethlehem to pursue normal urban planning, partly because of Israeli settlement activity.
These settlements, too, have long been considered illegal by the UN Security Council, yet Israel continues to build and confiscate land in contravention of international law, which forbids occupiers from benefiting from their military conquests.
Christmas is celebrated three times in Bethlehem, reflecting the rites of the three main churches that have been there for centuries. Catholics and those following the Gregorian calendar hold midnight mass on Dec. 25, while Orthodox Christians, who follow the eastern calendar, begin their Christmas celebrations on Jan. 6. Armenians hold the ritual on Jan. 18.
Every year, all the formalities dictated by the Ottoman Status Quo are observed. This centuries-old system of unwritten rules requires a very strict protocol governing where local leaders meet the head of the respective church and who is allowed to accompany the patriarchs and bishops at various entrance points.
Ten years ago, UNESCO declared Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity to be in danger. After extensive renovations by the Palestinian government, funded by private and official donors, the church’s mosaics and other elements, damaged by a fire centuries ago, were restored.
However, Palestinian Christians, who have been living continuously in Bethlehem for 2,000 years, do not want our churches to become museums. We want Christian pilgrims from around the world, including Arab Christians, to come to Bethlehem to visit the living stones.
For now, it is a blessing that Palestinians still hope and insist on a better tomorrow, despite the absence of any serious peace talks.
When the Christmas tree was lit, we prayed that the light from Bethlehem — from the darkness of military occupation — would reach the entire world. Our faith is not in a change of heart by our occupiers, but in the justice of our cause.
Two millennia ago, the skies of Bethlehem were lit as angels heralded the birth of Jesus by declaring: “Peace on Earth and goodwill to all.”
This Christmas, everyone in his hometown continued to yearn for that true peace.
Hanna Hanania is mayor of Bethlehem.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS