The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution (INC) met for the first time last month.
The INC was established by the UN Environment Assembly with a well-defined mission: to create the first-ever legally binding global agreement on plastic pollution.
The fact that delegates and observers finally met to have this discussion is welcome, but the meeting results are just the beginning of addressing the scale or scope of the problem.
Plastic pollution threatens people’s health and endangers the environment. Plastic causes harm throughout its entire lifecycle, beginning with resource extraction and continuing after disposal.
However, the problem is not just plastic itself. Plastic contains more than 10,000 chemicals, more than one-quarter of which are toxic to humans and wildlife.
In the absence of a global requirement that companies make known exactly which chemicals are in which plastic materials and goods, what we know about plastic in our lives is dictated by the whims of individual manufacturers and national legislatures. As a result, we are ignorant of the full extent of the problem. No one — from workers facing occupational hazards to parents trying to make healthy choices for their children — has all the information they could and should have.
Plastic does not affect everyone equally. Vulnerable groups such as low-income families, indigenous communities and people of color are especially at risk. For example, the vulnerable and disadvantaged are more likely to live or work near petrochemical manufacturing facilities and refineries, exposing them to air, water and soil pollution from the toxic chemicals used to manufacture plastic products.
This inequality exists within and between countries. Plastic products are often made in developing countries, transported to developed countries and then returned to developing countries as waste. It is not only the last stage of plastics’ lifecycle that creates pollution and endangers communities. Plastic production itself is hazardous.
Consider the textile sector, in which workers create clothes from synthetic fibers made of plastics. The workers are largely unaware of the toxicity of the chemicals they are using while they assemble skirts and shirts for people an ocean away. They do not have all the information they need to understand the risks they are facing from doing their jobs. There is an obvious gendered component to this, too, given that the textile sector in developing countries is dominated by women.
However, while people are unfairly and unevenly affected by plastic pollution, the reality is that no one is spared. Plastic pollution does not respect borders. Women everywhere use menstrual products containing plastics with chemicals that pose a direct risk to their health. Children all over the world, including in wealthy countries, play with plastic toys containing unknown chemicals.
Given the high-stakes challenges facing the first INC, it is disappointing that delegates did not even manage to adopt procedural rules. More substantive negotiations will be delayed until they do.
There were some small successes. The presence of observers permitted corridor conversations in which they could help delegates better understand the link between plastic, chemicals and health. This was reflected in some delegates’ statements, which highlighted the need for transparency on chemicals in plastics.
That is not nothing, but it is also not enough.
In May next year, delegates are to have another chance. Representatives of governments from around the world are to convene in Paris for the INC’s second meeting. Their mission will once again be to work toward a legally binding agreement on plastic pollution.
Delegates cannot simply retread the same ground as last month. Delegates will need to demonstrate their governments’ commitment to reducing plastic production. Together, they will need to consider the entire plastic lifecycle and the dangers that it poses to communities, people and the environment.
Perhaps most important, they will need to remember that the point of these meetings is to establish a global, legally binding instrument, not to shrug and sigh, and let countries follow mere voluntary guidelines, effectively allowing business as usual to continue.
In Paris next year, negotiations on plastic pollution need to be more efficient and more ambitious. Delegates must act as though they are saving the world.
If they get this right, they will be.
Olga Speranskaya and Alexandra Caterbow are codirectors of Health and Environment Justice Support.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused