In the past few years, “toad worship” culture has become an Internet phenomenon in China. “Toad” is a nickname for former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民), who always appeared in public wearing large thick-rimmed glasses. The nickname is used to avoid Internet censorship. Toad worshipers in the past few days have been signaling their respect for the memory of Jiang, who died last week.
Toad worship became a phenomenon after Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office. The belief is that the worshipers are appropriating the past to evaluate the present. Part of this sensation is the recognition of Jiang’s credentials and achievements.
Jiang graduated from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and trained in engineering in Moscow. He could speak eight languages, and once recited in English former US president Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.
By comparison, Xi graduated with a doctorate from Tsinghua University, but he often mispronounces words. The late top Chinese Communist Party (CCP) official Li Rui (李銳) once said that Xi’s cultural level was “elementary.”
Unlike the grim-faced former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and the rigid Xi, Jiang was more willing to show individual personality.
When he met the king of Spain, he took out a comb to tidy his hair. He once lashed out at a Hong Kong journalist, without hiding his anger. He did not refrain from looking at attractive women in public.
Even though some of these anecdotes could be seen as unbefitting of a president, Jiang was more valuable as a leader than a poser trying to endear himself to the people by eating with them and trying to recreate a cult of personality.
Most importantly, a leader should be judged by their performance. Jiang often said: “Keep silent and make a fortune,” which could be considered his guideline for governing China.
He learned a lesson from the reckless economic reforms of the 1980s, so he tried to open up China gradually. Under his leadership, the country joined the WTO and Beijing won its bid to host the 2008 Summer Olympics.
In terms of foreign relations, Jiang chose not to compete directly with the US. He was restrained when dealing with the US’ search of the China-based container ship Yinhe in 1993 and the US bombing of a Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999.
Xi, by comparison, began clashing with the US immediately after taking office, escalating a trade dispute and engaging in “wolf warrior diplomacy.”
Jiang was far from a perfect leader. He seized control of the editorial board of the now-defunct World Economic Herald and cracked down on Falun Gong members. There were rumors of bribery and corruption in his term, and after he stepped down, he retained his power in the military for some time.
All these are minor compared with Xi’s strict control of the media, establishment of concentration camps in Xinjiang, complete surveillance of citizens, appointment of his own clique, detention of dissidents and the abolition of term limits.
Toad worshipers, while commemorating Jiang, express discontent with Xi.
The death of former Chinese prime minister Zhou Enlai (周恩來) in 1976 and CCP leader Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦) in 1989 gave rise to two anti-government movements. Whether the “Blank Paper Movement” keeps growing along with Jiang’s death deserves attention.
Yang Chung-hsin is a civil servant.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS