Part of being, or becoming, allies is agreeing who your common enemies are and are not, otherwise, there would be no need for the alliance in the first place, but that is easier said than done, especially when at least one ally is on an ego trip worthy of an Ottoman sultan.
In the NATO alliance, that would yet again be Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He is out only for himself, and making things unnecessarily complicated as a result.
To look strong at home before an election in June next year, he keeps messing with the minds of friends and foes alike, caring not a whit whether his shenanigans undermine Western cohesion and European security in general.
Illustration: Mountain People
Almost all of NATO’s 30 members agree that Russia under President Vladimir Putin is the alliance’s main adversary. The word “almost” is necessary only because one member, Hungary, under Prime Minister Viktor Orban, refuses to line up unequivocally with the West and Ukraine against Moscow. Erdogan, too, is keeping his options open, often playing frenemies with Putin. Sometimes that produces good results, as when the two struck a deal to let Ukraine export grain. Other times, it just raises eyebrows.
Erdogan is behaving even more irresponsibly when it comes to Sweden and Finland, two non-NATO members that want to join the alliance. Their memberships would be good for all involved. The Nordic nations would be safer under NATO’s Article 5, the one that says that an attack on one is an attack on all, and NATO would be stronger for the Nordics’ military prowess and strategic geography.
However, Turkey and Hungary are dragging their feet in ratifying the two accessions. Erdogan is the main problem. In effect, he is blackmailing Sweden to adopt his view of politics in the Middle East. To Erdogan, all Kurdish organizations, whether they are based in Turkey, Syria or elsewhere, are terrorists needing to be banned and fought, and he wants other countries, notably Sweden, to toe the same line.
Erdogan is not totally wrong about terrorism, or about the Kurds. On Sunday in Istanbul, a bomb killed at least six people and injured scores — a woman has been arrested, although it is unclear whether she has any ties to Kurdish organizations, as the Turkish minister of interior claims.
The US and the EU have also outlawed the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), a Kurdish group in Turkey, but they have not blacklisted the People’s Defense Units (YPG), a Kurdish militia in Syria that has ambiguous links to the PKK and has been an ally in fighting the Islamic State group. Similarly, Sweden, which has a large Kurdish diaspora and several members of parliament of Kurdish descent, has also taken a nuanced approach so far. Erdogan wants to end that.
Sweden now appears ready to meet Erdogan’s demands as best it can and its right to do so. For Sweden, membership in NATO and security against Russia are much more important than policy toward the Kurds.
Where Erdogan is completely out of line is the Aegean Sea. NATO’s worst internal tension has for decades been the enmity between two nominal allies, Turkey and Greece, who really consider each other enemies. Ever since they emerged from the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, the two states have been bickering, daggers drawn, over islands in the Mediterranean, the rights to explore its sea beds for natural gas and more.
Lately, their sparring has become more than verbal again. Greece complains that Turkey is constantly violating Greek territorial waters and airspace. Turkey accuses Greece of harassing Turkish jets during a joint NATO mission, and even of locking an anti-aircraft system onto Turkish F-16s near Crete.
With allies like these, who needs enemies?
“The islands you occupy do not bind us,” Erdogan taunted Greece the other day. “We will do what is necessary when the time comes. As we say, we can come suddenly one night.”
You read that right: Erdogan is actually threatening war against another NATO member.
All alliances, like most families, have their tensions and Erdogan has already been playing the role of bete noire for years — to the particular chagrin of other allies, he even bought an air-defense system from Putin that could compromise the technology inside US-made fighter jets.
However, unlike Hungary, Turkey is also strategically indispensable. It has NATO’s second-largest army, after the US, and thanks to its geography, it can project power into the Black, Aegean and Mediterranean seas, as well as southeastern Europe, northern Africa, the Caucasus and the Middle East.
Trying to figure out what Erdogan really wants has therefore become an obsession in NATO capitals second only to analyzing Putin’s mind. Is Erdogan just blustering in the buildup to the election? Is he angling for sweetheart military deals with the US? Does he actually want to rebuild Turkey in the image of the Ottomans, rather as Putin fantasizes about restoring the empire of the Tsars? Above all, would Erdogan be a reliable ally in the event of war?
The times we are living in are much too serious for these kinds of distractions. The West must stay united and strong. For that, we must close ranks with the Nordics, and put aside ancient but vacuous feuds like the one between Greece and Turkey.
One objective must override all others — to deter Putin from escalating and widening his war. As Turks should remind their president, that is just as much in Turkey’s interest as in NATO’s.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics. A former editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then