At its peak, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had 548 Confucius Institutes and 1,193 Confucius Classrooms around the world — until they became regarded as platforms for Chinese espionage and propaganda.
Before then, the CCP’s United Front Work Department was using the institutes to monitor overseas Chinese students and expatriates, suppress freedom of speech, manipulate ideology abroad and facilitate intelligence gathering, as well as promote Chinese propaganda by censoring issues deemed sensitive to the Chinese government.
Beijing was also using the institutes to make opaque financial transactions between local academic institutions, civic groups and politicians, which led to Western countries closing them for the threat they posed to national security. Nonetheless, some institutes have reappeared as Chinese Language Learning Centers, and continue to serve as propaganda arms and recruiters for intelligence gathering.
As Confucius Institutes closed, a network of vocational programs called Luban Workshops started to open. Named after Lu Ban (魯班), a mythical Chinese figure revered as a patron of builders, the workshops were launched to train talent overseas. To expand China’s political space by forming stronger ties with developing countries, the program provides skills and knowledge in areas such as electronics, Chinese medicine, enterprises and cuisine for students in countries taking part in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
The export model of the Luban Workshops has come to be known as “Confucius Institute 2.0.”
Some differences exist. One is that Confucius Institutes expanded sharply after their launch in 2004. By the end of January 2012, there were institutes and 500 Confucius Classrooms worldwide. In contrast, Luban Workshops have expanded more discreetly — only 25 have been founded since 2016.
Another difference is that their focus is not on exporting Chinese propaganda and culture, but to introduce Chinese medicine and Chinese manufacturing business models to developing countries, whereas Confucius Institutes have been concentrated in developed Western countries.
Also, when the Confucius Institutes were established, they were directed by the CCP, while the Luban Workshops are purportedly backed by Tianjin Light Industry Vocational Technical College, which is meant to alleviate concerns of CCP involvement.
However, during meetings with foreign guests, party leaders such as Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) have mentioned Luban Workshops on several occasions, indicating that the program has been approved by the Beijing government.
Luban Workshops might be a result of the CCP learning its lesson after Western countries cracked down on its Confucius Institutes. Based on China’s record of using the institutes to infiltrate nations, Luban Workshops could become new hubs for spreading Chinese propaganda and gathering intelligence.
Western nations are trying to counter China’s influence with a large influx of resources and funds.
The “Chinese models” taught in the workshops could help fuel a totalitarian regime and undermine democracy.
As the global community is monitoring the influence of Confucius Institutes and Luban Workshops, now might be a crucial moment and a good opportunity for Taiwan to step forward to help fill this gap — not only in teaching Mandarin as a global language, but also in facilitating cultural exchanges.
It is up to the government to integrate various resources to fully realize the spirit of “Taiwan Can Help.”
Kung Hsien-tai is director of the ethics department at Taiwan Financial Holdings.
Translated by Rita Wang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they