More than 100 professionals, including the incumbent and former presidents of the Taiwanese Society of Psychiatry, have signed a petition calling for politicians to stop making suicide a campaign topic, Chinese-language media reported.
The petition came after separate news reports that a large number of bodies of people who apparently committed suicide had been found in Kaohsiung’s waterways, highlighting the issue, but also potentially triggering copycat attempts.
I log on to the popular gossip board on the Professional Technology Temple (PTT) online academic bulletin board system every day to skim through the headlines. About two to three months ago, I found that “floating corpses in Kaohsiung” was trending.
Searches for “floating corpses” on PTT return 85 results from before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Ko Chih-en (柯志恩) posted about the issue on Sept. 16, with 33 of them being about Kaohsiung and 52 about other cities. If floating corpses are a prevalent issue in Taiwan, why is the spotlight on Kaohsiung?
Perhaps it is due to the media’s enthusiastic reporting, Internet users reposting Ko’s post and high click-through rates. The reporting on the issue might have led to more suicides in Kaohsiung, and consequently more suicide victims being found in the city’s waterways.
It shows that increased attention on suicide can exacerbate the problem. The more the public dwells on the subject, the more people might attempt suicide, therefore obliging the Kaohsiung City Government to increase its suicide prevention resources.
However, river banks are long, and there is only so much that a government can do. For decades, Kaohsiung’s suicide rate has ranked first or second among the six special municipalities. Kaohsiung is plagued with several issues, such as an aging population, economically disadvantaged rural areas and middle-age unemployment due to the relocation of pollution and labor-intensive industries. These could be factors in Kaohsiung’s high suicide rate.
However, these discussions are no match for the sensationalizing headlines about “floating corpses.”
The highest overall rate of suicide in Taiwan is among senior citizens. Of the six special municipalities, Taipei has the largest population of senior citizens, followed by Kaohsiung, but there is a large gap between the two cities’ suicide rates.
Senior citizens in the capital in 2015 had an annual income of NT$710,000 on average, which is not too different from the average income of NT$900,000 for those under 65, Taipei City Government data showed. With a vast Mass Rapid Transit system and a high density of hospitals, senior citizens can lead a satisfying and convenient life in Taipei.
Kaohsiung’s air pollution might also be a factor in the high suicide rate. Air pollution with fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers can affect the human brain, and there is no academic consensus on its influence on the prevalence of suicide in highly polluted areas.
It might be impossible to stop the media and Internet users from hyping up the issue, but politicians should know better than to add fuel to the fire by discussing suicide methods.
The KMT could instead highlight the economic situation in Kaohsiung, the issue of young people from southern Taiwan relocating to the north as they search for better work opportunities, or the city government’s mental health budget.
It is up to Kaohsiung residents to decide if they have been satisfied with the policies implemented by Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) over the past two years. Nonetheless, people should, above all, lay off the phrase “floating corpses.”
Chen Fong-wei is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Rita Wang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then