A proposal to discuss the Uighur issue at the UN Human Rights Council meeting was rejected by a vote of 19-17 on Thursday last week. Based on the 19 votes against the proposal, Chinese Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs Hua Chunying (華春瑩) declared the vote a victory for China.
While Hua claimed this victory against Uighur activists, who are considered national enemies in China, these same Uighur activists do not consider the vote a failure, because we did not pay for the 17 votes in favor of the proposal. We did not pressure or put a yoke on any country. Those 17 votes resulted from facts and truth.
This difference of votes is likely to be a failure in terms of the global human rights movement and the influence of the West on the international stage.
However, for Uighur activists, it is a victory to be able to knock on the door of the UN Human Rights Council. China has tried its best to prevent the Uighur issue from being raised at the international body for years and even repeatedly had Uighur activists expelled from UN meetings. Uighur students abroad were sent back, and Uighur citizens in East Turkestan, also known as Xinjiang, were banned from obtaining passports.
The aim of all these actions was to block the Uighur issue from reaching the threshold of the UN.
However, despite the proposal not being adopted, the Uighur situation is now on the agenda of the international arena. We took one step forward.
Hua also called the vote “the victory of developing countries over the West and America.” This statement is incorrect. It is developing countries following a murderous country out of necessity. It is a countermeasure for countries like Cuba and Venezuela that want to hide their own human rights issues. Even if there are 1,000 Cubans, 1,000 Pakistanis and 1,000 Venezuelans who follow China for profit, it is enough to have one Lithuanian, one French or one Czech citizen standing behind us for the sake of justice. This is our pride, strength and hope.
Hua said that the vote is a victory of justice over injustice, but in reality, it is a victory of deceit and violence over truth. This is a transitory victory because China is waging a war not only against Uighurs, but also against humanity and God through genocide.
The proposal’s rejection is not a consequence outside our estimation. Therefore, we are not swayed from our paths and goals.
Six years ago, when we said that China imprisoned more than 1 million Uighurs, the world did not believe it. Two years later, Gay McDougall, a member of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, cited estimates that 2 million Uighurs and Muslim minorities were forced into “political camps for indoctrination” in the Uighur region.
In 2020, when 39 Western countries issued a statement criticizing China’s Uighur policy, 65 countries signed a statement against it. However, after the UN Uighur report, that number dropped from 65 to 21.
As a people who have been oppressed by Chinese rule for 70 years, we fully understand the Chinese threat, which is why we believe that those who voted in support of Beijing will one day not only be ashamed, but will also regret their vote and will be punished by history.
In 1997, when then-US secretary of state Madeleine Albright first raised the Uighur issue at the UN, she began by saying: “There is a people called Uighur in China.” Clearly, it needed to be explained that we existed. Today, the issue of whether there is a Uighur genocide is about to be discussed.
Over the past 30 years, China has accelerated its plan to exterminate Uighurs to the level of genocide and Uighur activists have brought the Uighur cause to the UN Human Rights Council’s threshold. This is the beginning of our victory. We have no doubt that while the score was 19-17 last week, it will be 1-46 someday, because the 19 voices against the proposal shed light on the evil reality of the world today, while the 17 voices in favor showed the noble nature of humanity and revealed our prospects.
Of course, from this result, we have a deeper understanding of the world, including our neighbors and “brothers.”
Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to the countries and people of the 17 representatives who voted for us on behalf of more than 3 million Uighur captives who have been in prisons and camps for six years.
Rebiya Kadeer is a former president of the World Uyghur Congress. Kok Bayraq is a US-based Uighur observer.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past