As Thai politicians jockey for positions ahead of elections that must be called by March next year, focus is turning to how the next leadership will manage risks including sky-high prices, a bloated budget deficit and the highest level of household debt in the region.
The tepid pace of recovery in Southeast Asia’s second-largest economy will be front and center for voters as authorities grapple with the fastest inflation in 14 years, the baht’s plunge to the lowest since 2006 and household debt at 88 percent of GDP.
“While the recovery in tourism will help support growth over the next two to three years, an aging population and high household debt places Thailand as the laggard in the region,” said Lee Ju Ye (李居業), an economist at Maybank Investment Banking Group. “These are challenges that will not be easily resolved even with a new prime minister.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Tourism makes up 12 percent of GDP.
Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who last week won a favorable court ruling on a tenure dispute, has seen his popularity slide, reflecting the growing public disappointment with his government’s efforts to rebuild an economy that is still reeling from the COVID-19 pandemic and lagging peers in the region.
Paetongtarn Shinawatra, daughter of former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and Thai lawmaker Pita Limjaroenrat from the opposition Move Forward Party are top choices for prime minister in recent opinion polls.
Here are some of the economic challenges the next administration are likely to inherit:
RISING COSTS
Thailand’s recovery has been uneven, with those in export industries bouncing back faster while low-earners and tourism workers struggle amid inflation of more than 7 percent, triggering the first price hike in a decade among noodle makers and the first increase in minimum wage since 2020. Lately, the nation has to worry about the impact of floods, too.
The Bank of Thailand is expected to keep tightening rates although at a gradual pace compared with peers in the region. Lenders also have subsequently raised rates. The central bank has said price gains should cool to within its target by the middle of next year.
Net-oil importer Thailand continues to subsidize diesel, electricity and cooking gas. The Cabinet extended some of the support until Nov. 20, mindful of the pain on consumers, which is also exacerbating household debt.
ELEVATED DEBT
Household debt has jumped by 1.1 trillion baht (US$29.5 billion) to almost 90 percent of GDP from 80 percent before the pandemic. Although the ratio eased slightly in the second quarter, it remains the highest in Southeast Asia, making it tougher for the government to stimulate the economy. In the past, frustration with debt has sparked protests among farmers.
“Slower growth and higher inflation are exacerbating household debt and inequality,” said Pipat Luengnaruemitchai, chief economist at Bangkok-based Kiatnakin Phatra Securities.
These problems, if unresolved, could unleash more political and economic woes, he said.
Record Deficit
The government has spent about US$5.5 billion to subsidize energy prices, and the latest extension is expected to increase the bill by another 20 billion baht.
The budget gap ballooned to a record 700 billion baht in the fiscal year that ended last month, compared with 450 billion baht in 2019.
“We have exhausted all the fiscal ammunition during COVID with relief schemes and cash handouts,” said Kiatanantha Lounkaew, a lecturer of economics at Thammasat University.
On the brighter side, borrowing for the fiscal year that started this month was set at 1.05 trillion baht, substantially lower than the record 1.8 trillion baht in fiscal 2021.
BAHT VOLATILITY
The baht has lost 20 percent since the end of 2020. While this might be good for exports and tourism, the volatility hits investors and consumers.
There had been calls on the central bank to reconsider a hands-off stance as the baht depreciates. The Federation of Thai Industries, the nation’s top business group, said companies want a stable baht to prevent inflation from squeezing their profit margins.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS