As Thai politicians jockey for positions ahead of elections that must be called by March next year, focus is turning to how the next leadership will manage risks including sky-high prices, a bloated budget deficit and the highest level of household debt in the region.
The tepid pace of recovery in Southeast Asia’s second-largest economy will be front and center for voters as authorities grapple with the fastest inflation in 14 years, the baht’s plunge to the lowest since 2006 and household debt at 88 percent of GDP.
“While the recovery in tourism will help support growth over the next two to three years, an aging population and high household debt places Thailand as the laggard in the region,” said Lee Ju Ye (李居業), an economist at Maybank Investment Banking Group. “These are challenges that will not be easily resolved even with a new prime minister.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Tourism makes up 12 percent of GDP.
Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who last week won a favorable court ruling on a tenure dispute, has seen his popularity slide, reflecting the growing public disappointment with his government’s efforts to rebuild an economy that is still reeling from the COVID-19 pandemic and lagging peers in the region.
Paetongtarn Shinawatra, daughter of former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and Thai lawmaker Pita Limjaroenrat from the opposition Move Forward Party are top choices for prime minister in recent opinion polls.
Here are some of the economic challenges the next administration are likely to inherit:
RISING COSTS
Thailand’s recovery has been uneven, with those in export industries bouncing back faster while low-earners and tourism workers struggle amid inflation of more than 7 percent, triggering the first price hike in a decade among noodle makers and the first increase in minimum wage since 2020. Lately, the nation has to worry about the impact of floods, too.
The Bank of Thailand is expected to keep tightening rates although at a gradual pace compared with peers in the region. Lenders also have subsequently raised rates. The central bank has said price gains should cool to within its target by the middle of next year.
Net-oil importer Thailand continues to subsidize diesel, electricity and cooking gas. The Cabinet extended some of the support until Nov. 20, mindful of the pain on consumers, which is also exacerbating household debt.
ELEVATED DEBT
Household debt has jumped by 1.1 trillion baht (US$29.5 billion) to almost 90 percent of GDP from 80 percent before the pandemic. Although the ratio eased slightly in the second quarter, it remains the highest in Southeast Asia, making it tougher for the government to stimulate the economy. In the past, frustration with debt has sparked protests among farmers.
“Slower growth and higher inflation are exacerbating household debt and inequality,” said Pipat Luengnaruemitchai, chief economist at Bangkok-based Kiatnakin Phatra Securities.
These problems, if unresolved, could unleash more political and economic woes, he said.
Record Deficit
The government has spent about US$5.5 billion to subsidize energy prices, and the latest extension is expected to increase the bill by another 20 billion baht.
The budget gap ballooned to a record 700 billion baht in the fiscal year that ended last month, compared with 450 billion baht in 2019.
“We have exhausted all the fiscal ammunition during COVID with relief schemes and cash handouts,” said Kiatanantha Lounkaew, a lecturer of economics at Thammasat University.
On the brighter side, borrowing for the fiscal year that started this month was set at 1.05 trillion baht, substantially lower than the record 1.8 trillion baht in fiscal 2021.
BAHT VOLATILITY
The baht has lost 20 percent since the end of 2020. While this might be good for exports and tourism, the volatility hits investors and consumers.
There had been calls on the central bank to reconsider a hands-off stance as the baht depreciates. The Federation of Thai Industries, the nation’s top business group, said companies want a stable baht to prevent inflation from squeezing their profit margins.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS