Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) performance in an interview with German media outlet Deutsche Welle (DW) published on Tuesday has been described as “disastrous” by several Chinese-language news media and political pundits in Taiwan.
The interview was meant to discuss the KMT’s view of cross-strait relations and clarify the purpose of KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia’s (夏立言) controversial visit to China last month while China was conducting live-fire military exercises around Taiwan.
Chu, who ran for president in 2016, surprised people by dodging questions, denying factual statements, referencing intangible concepts and abruptly ending the interview by saying: “Thank you for your interview, the time is up.”
In the interview, Chu claimed that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government refuses to communicate with China, placing Taiwan in a dangerous position, while the KMT’s goal is to maintain the “status quo” — the preference of the majority of Taiwanese — by “maintaining a channel of dialogue between Taiwan and China” to avoid war.
However, Chu began dodging questions when he was asked how the KMT plans to communicate with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to avoid war, and how it could convey polls that show that less than 7 percent of Taiwanese want “unification” with China, as it would be against Xi’s will to sustain the cross-strait “status quo.”
Chu insisted that the KMT could achieve its goal of maintaining the “status quo” by communicating with China, as the KMT-led administrations had done for many years since 1987, brushing off the fact that the Chinese government has changed.
The peak of Chu’s “disastrous” interview was when the interviewer cited a June poll by the National Chengchi University Election Study Center, which showed that only 14 percent of Taiwanese identify with the KMT. Chu rejected the poll, calling it “wrong information” and saying that “our party will win the election,” which is the best poll.
It is unclear whether Chu was unprepared, or whether he intentionally gave ambiguous answers to avoid revealing the paradoxical reality of his party’s strategy, possibly out of fear of upsetting China or Taiwan. Yet it is regrettable that he could not clearly explain the KMT’s cross-strait perspective.
Chu failed to define the “status quo” that the KMT is trying to preserve. He could not explain whether the “status quo” is dynamic, or what the KMT could do if China tries to change it. This will not persuade people to trust the KMT to represent them in negotiations with China without sacrificing their interests — whether that be the protection of a democratic way of life or economic interests.
Although Taiwan and the global community have observed China’s attempt to undermine the “status quo,” including its rapid military expansion, its incursions over the Taiwan Strait median line and its economic threats against Taiwan, Chu downplayed China’s responsibility by blaming the DPP, rhetoric also used by Beijing.
In contrast, Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), in an interview DW published last week, clearly stated the DPP-led government’s commitment to maintaining the “status quo” — which he defined as both sides “having no jurisdiction over each other,” and that “Taiwan is already a democracy” in which the people have a say over its future. He explained its strategy for facing China’s escalating threat to Taiwan and the global community.
If Chu and the KMT cannot clearly communicate the party’s understanding of the “status quo” and its ability to protect it, but continues to paint a vague, escapist picture of a seemingly peaceful “status quo” achieved by the KMT in the past as its vision for the future, it is no wonder the party is seeing record-low party identification.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS