The 27 national leaders of the EU love to extol the solidarity that binds their countries together. Even the words signal destiny. “Union” comes via French from the Latin “unus” for “one,” and “solidarity” from “solidus” for “firm, whole and undivided.” Like a good marriage, the bloc is meant to be a solidarity union.
In reality, it is no such thing, and Europe’s enemies know it. That includes Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as autocrats in China and afield. The EU’s biggest problem is the inability to see threats, responsibilities and sacrifices as shared.
Right now, the nail-biting is about Putin — his physical warfare against Ukraine and his hybrid warfare against the EU. His weapon of choice is energy. Putin has spent two decades making the EU vulnerable — that is, dependent on Russian natural gas and other hydrocarbons — by building a network of pipelines to gullible nations such as Germany. This year, following his invasion of Ukraine in February, he has cocked these weapons and put his finger on the trigger.
Illustration: Mountain People
In early summer, he throttled the gas flowing through Nord Stream 1, a big pipeline from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea, to 60 percent of its capacity. This week, he further reduced that to 20 percent. He could turn it down more, or off.
As a result, Europe’s storage tanks are likely to be emptier than they should be going into winter. Putin is threatening to make Europeans shiver in unheated homes and to force swathes of Europe’s industry to shut down.
As in any of its crises, the question for the EU is what to do about this mess. So the countries most affected — led by Germany in this case — are invoking that famous sense of solidarity.
Last week, the European Commission proposed that the entire bloc voluntarily reduce its gas consumption by 15 percent, with mandatory cuts to follow if necessary. The reaction was inevitable, understandable — and hardly reassuring.
Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece and several other member states do not rely on Russian gas, and therefore are not really at much risk.
Moreover, any gas savings they foist on their own companies and residents would not help Germans, because there are no pipelines to carry spare gas from Madrid or Malta to Bavaria or Berlin. So why should they say “yes” to coerced rationing?
And besides, is it not Germany that bears responsibility? Many Europeans spent years warning Berlin against building two Baltic pipelines to Russia and simultaneously exiting nuclear power. Smugly, Germany ignored its partners and pooh-poohed the threat emanating from the Kremlin. Germans asking Spaniards to take shorter showers now seems a bit rich — and hypocritical.
A decade ago, during the euro crisis, the roles were reversed. Financial turmoil that had started in the US caused sell-offs in debt securities of member states such as Spain, Portugal and Greece — even threatening an involuntary “Grexit.”
However, when those countries asked for solidarity from Germany and other northern countries, they instead got lectures on the evils of their profligacy for having borrowed too much in the first place.
The EU was no more enthusiastic about showing solidarity in 2015, when more than 1 million refugees crossed from Turkey to Greece, itself still reeling from the euro crisis.
Some member states — including Germany — offered help, but others — led by Poland and Hungary — balked.
Ditto in 2020, when COVID-19 emerged. The instinctive reflex of member states was to slam their borders shut — even for masks and medical gear — turning the EU’s vaunted “single market” into a travesty. Europeans then came perilously close to fighting over COVID-19 vaccines, but eventually, Brussels got its act together.
However, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted that “we caught a glimpse of the abyss” — that is, an unraveling of the EU.
What if the invaders were Russian soldiers instead of viruses? Given the EU’s track record, member states on the front line would be forgiven for finding talk about a “European army” risible.
Would Dutch, Italians and Germans send their sons and daughters to die defending Estonians, Latvians or Poles? Yes, is the answer, but that is because they are NATO members and backed by the US, not because they are in the EU and high on solidarity.
The major powers of the world understand this weakness of the EU. Europe’s friends in Washington worry about it; its foes in Moscow and Beijing try to exploit it. To add to the EU’s internal strife, Turkey and Belarus, for example, have tried to concoct renewed refugee crises.
European leaders are just as aware and therefore want to de-emphasize the vulnerability.
Take German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. In praising Europe’s “unity,” he doth protest too much. Betraying how little he thinks there is of it, he immediately segues to demanding the end of national vetoes and “individual member states egotistically blocking European decisions.”
He had Hungary in mind, but others feel that way about Germany.
As is their wont, the EU’s 27 members this week settled their latest spat about gas savings in the usual way: They fudged and wangled a compromise.
Gas would be saved — somewhere, somehow — but so many countries would have opt-outs, loopholes and exceptions that you would need a magnifying glass to find the solidarity. Putin saw nothing in Brussels this week to make him nervous.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics, a former editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS