The 27 national leaders of the EU love to extol the solidarity that binds their countries together. Even the words signal destiny. “Union” comes via French from the Latin “unus” for “one,” and “solidarity” from “solidus” for “firm, whole and undivided.” Like a good marriage, the bloc is meant to be a solidarity union.
In reality, it is no such thing, and Europe’s enemies know it. That includes Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as autocrats in China and afield. The EU’s biggest problem is the inability to see threats, responsibilities and sacrifices as shared.
Right now, the nail-biting is about Putin — his physical warfare against Ukraine and his hybrid warfare against the EU. His weapon of choice is energy. Putin has spent two decades making the EU vulnerable — that is, dependent on Russian natural gas and other hydrocarbons — by building a network of pipelines to gullible nations such as Germany. This year, following his invasion of Ukraine in February, he has cocked these weapons and put his finger on the trigger.
Illustration: Mountain People
In early summer, he throttled the gas flowing through Nord Stream 1, a big pipeline from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea, to 60 percent of its capacity. This week, he further reduced that to 20 percent. He could turn it down more, or off.
As a result, Europe’s storage tanks are likely to be emptier than they should be going into winter. Putin is threatening to make Europeans shiver in unheated homes and to force swathes of Europe’s industry to shut down.
As in any of its crises, the question for the EU is what to do about this mess. So the countries most affected — led by Germany in this case — are invoking that famous sense of solidarity.
Last week, the European Commission proposed that the entire bloc voluntarily reduce its gas consumption by 15 percent, with mandatory cuts to follow if necessary. The reaction was inevitable, understandable — and hardly reassuring.
Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece and several other member states do not rely on Russian gas, and therefore are not really at much risk.
Moreover, any gas savings they foist on their own companies and residents would not help Germans, because there are no pipelines to carry spare gas from Madrid or Malta to Bavaria or Berlin. So why should they say “yes” to coerced rationing?
And besides, is it not Germany that bears responsibility? Many Europeans spent years warning Berlin against building two Baltic pipelines to Russia and simultaneously exiting nuclear power. Smugly, Germany ignored its partners and pooh-poohed the threat emanating from the Kremlin. Germans asking Spaniards to take shorter showers now seems a bit rich — and hypocritical.
A decade ago, during the euro crisis, the roles were reversed. Financial turmoil that had started in the US caused sell-offs in debt securities of member states such as Spain, Portugal and Greece — even threatening an involuntary “Grexit.”
However, when those countries asked for solidarity from Germany and other northern countries, they instead got lectures on the evils of their profligacy for having borrowed too much in the first place.
The EU was no more enthusiastic about showing solidarity in 2015, when more than 1 million refugees crossed from Turkey to Greece, itself still reeling from the euro crisis.
Some member states — including Germany — offered help, but others — led by Poland and Hungary — balked.
Ditto in 2020, when COVID-19 emerged. The instinctive reflex of member states was to slam their borders shut — even for masks and medical gear — turning the EU’s vaunted “single market” into a travesty. Europeans then came perilously close to fighting over COVID-19 vaccines, but eventually, Brussels got its act together.
However, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted that “we caught a glimpse of the abyss” — that is, an unraveling of the EU.
What if the invaders were Russian soldiers instead of viruses? Given the EU’s track record, member states on the front line would be forgiven for finding talk about a “European army” risible.
Would Dutch, Italians and Germans send their sons and daughters to die defending Estonians, Latvians or Poles? Yes, is the answer, but that is because they are NATO members and backed by the US, not because they are in the EU and high on solidarity.
The major powers of the world understand this weakness of the EU. Europe’s friends in Washington worry about it; its foes in Moscow and Beijing try to exploit it. To add to the EU’s internal strife, Turkey and Belarus, for example, have tried to concoct renewed refugee crises.
European leaders are just as aware and therefore want to de-emphasize the vulnerability.
Take German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. In praising Europe’s “unity,” he doth protest too much. Betraying how little he thinks there is of it, he immediately segues to demanding the end of national vetoes and “individual member states egotistically blocking European decisions.”
He had Hungary in mind, but others feel that way about Germany.
As is their wont, the EU’s 27 members this week settled their latest spat about gas savings in the usual way: They fudged and wangled a compromise.
Gas would be saved — somewhere, somehow — but so many countries would have opt-outs, loopholes and exceptions that you would need a magnifying glass to find the solidarity. Putin saw nothing in Brussels this week to make him nervous.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics, a former editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have