At the G7 summit in Germany late last month, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida criticized China for sending vessels near the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台, known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan). He took issue with Beijing for its exploration of gas fields in Japanese waters in the East China Sea, and for threatening the security of the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida also said that China should not be allowed to change the “status quo” by force, and specifically referred to the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. He called on G7 nations to strengthen security cooperation with Indo-Pacific nations.
After the G7 meeting, Kishida attended the NATO summit in Madrid. It was the first time Japan and South Korea were invited to the summit. Their attendance shows that the Europe and the US’ strategic center of gravity is shifting to the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida’s address at the summit expressed a thought of every attendee: “Ukraine today may be East Asia tomorrow.”
Although the war in Ukraine continues to rage, the real threat to world peace is not Russia, a declining power, but China, with its expansionist ambitions in the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida stressed that Japan would bolster its defenses in the next five years, and pledged that his administration would significantly increase the national defense budget.
China immediately hit back by convening a discussion forum in Beijing and drawing upon former Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama, whose family has a history of close ties with China.
At the forum, the fourth-generation pro-China, anti-US propagandist — who holds the dubious record of being Japan’s shortest-serving prime minister, from Sept. 16, 2009, to June 8, 2010 — stated that China’s claims to the Senkaku Islands were reasonable, and lambasted Kishida’s views on China, which he said were “encouraging Taiwanese independence.”
Beijing’s reaction and use of Hatoyama as a spokesperson prove that Kishida’s intentions are correct. Much of Japan’s current strategic planning around national security and foreign diplomacy, including Kishida’s public remarks at the G7 and NATO summits, demonstrate substantial support for Taiwanese independence.
The rationale behind Japan’s positioning is clear: An independent, self-governing Taiwan is a vital impediment to China’s expansionist strategy.
Before Kishida assumed office, observers in Taiwan worried about his past inclinations toward the pro-China wing of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party, and wondered if he would he continue on the trajectory of the administration of former prime minster Shinzo Abe, which displayed its strong support for Taiwan.
Today we can say that those fears were unfounded, and this should not be surprising. After all, Japan’s long-term strategic interest does not alter with the whims of each prime minister. Although Kishida might have previously shown goodwill toward China, he is clearly deeply cognizant of the threat China poses to Japan’s security — and even to world peace.
Taiwan should respond to Kishida’s firm support for the nation by signaling that it looks forward to deepening bilateral relations as close allies.
Now in its second term, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration should cast off the confusing and perplexing name “Republic of China” and tell the world that this peaceful fortress within the Indo-Pacific region stands firmly in the camp of other liberal democracies, and resolutely resists annexation by the dictatorship in the People’s Republic of China.
Tommy Lin is director of Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with