Over the past few days, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) has been visiting eight countries in the South Pacific, starting with the Solomon Islands, where he arrived on Thursday last week. A leaked secret document showed that the Solomon Islands would allow the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to station personnel in its territory.
Wang said that the purpose of the agreement between the two countries was to help the Solomon Islands upgrade its police force’s law enforcement capabilities, adding that China had no intention of building a military base there.
However, the issue still raises concerns in Australia, as well as in Europe and the Americas.
China has in the past few years been eager to expand its military presence overseas. For example, it has been conducting joint multinational exercises with Shanghai Cooperation Organization member nations since 2005 and participating in anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden since 2008. It established its first overseas base in the east African nation of Djibouti in 2017 and conducts regular military training exchanges with its two key security partners, Russia and Pakistan. It would therefore not be surprising if China wanted to set up a military base in the Solomon Islands.
More important is Wang’s statement that the agreement “aims to assist the Solomon Islands in improving its policing and law enforcement capabilities, and support the Solomon Islands to better safeguard its social security.”
China has for years been training the law enforcement of developing countries in Africa, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia in the name of “public security and police exchanges,” and providing them with hardware and software support at little to no cost.
In 2011, it set up the China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand Mekong River Joint Patrol Law Enforcement Joint Headquarters in China’s Yunnan Province, and the four countries have conducted at least 117 joint patrols.
The presence of Chinese officers enforcing the law in Southeast Asian countries shows the reach of China’s influence and penetration in the region.
Last year’s China Index published by Taiwan’s Doublethink Lab found that among 36 countries and territories around the world, Southeast Asia is the region where China exerts the greatest influence.
Most of the countries where China promotes exchanges in policing are authoritarian nations with internal strife and relatively underdeveloped economies.
China benefits from the arrangements, such as by requesting natural resources in exchange for training. For example, Ecuador has exchanged petroleum for surveillance systems made by China’s Huawei Technologies and Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, which enable its law enforcement to increase surveillance of political opponents and the public. Iran and Bolivia have similar arrangements.
In some cases, China sends members of its military and police units as advisers, establishing an international system of “law enforcement and security cooperation with Chinese characteristics.”
Through this “internationalization of public security,” which attracts little international attention, China has expanded its influence in Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America, posing a threat to the security of those regions and eroding the sovereignty of the countries involved.
Such activities undermine democratic institutions and empower dictators to control their subjects.
China can also use the equipment involved to conduct overseas intelligence gathering, which is a serious breach of global democracy and freedom.
Huang Rui-guang is a doctor of law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of