As a Taiwan Fellowship scholar at National Chung Hsing University and a former officer of the secretariat of the Indian Parliament, which is currently constructing a new parliament building, I read with great interest recent articles about a proposal to construct a new building for the Legislative Yuan and feel impelled to share India’s example.
Most of the Indian Parliament’s buildings were constructed in olden times: Many show signs of aging and struggle to meet the demands of the present day in terms of space, quality and technology. However, since the iconic buildings have great historical value, the authorities are faced with the challenges of maintaining change with continuity.
As India and Taiwan share a convergence of democratic values and parliamentary procedural nuances, Taiwan might benefit from India’s experiences in the conceptualization of the building design, if not the construction — as Taiwan is advanced in this regard — and at a time when the relationship between India and Taiwan is on an upward trajectory.
The present Parliament House is an iconic piece of architecture whose foundation was laid more than a century ago in 1921, when the country was under British rule. The building was inaugurated in January 1927 by the then-viceroy of India Lord Irwin. The Central Legislative Assembly met for the first time in the newly built Parliament House when India was under British rule. The building has been witness to many historic events in the annals of India’s history. The Constituent Assembly adopted the constitution of India in the magnificent Central Hall of the Parliament Building. The building resonates with India’s hallowed history.
However, with the passage of time, the building has reached the threshold of its limits. A report by the secretariat of the Lok Sabha (Popular House) said that the building has been showing signs of distress due to overutilization.
Changing circumstances and advances in technology have necessitated a demand in terms of space, amenities and technology upgrades. Fire safety measures have also been upgraded. A building that hosts high dignitaries like the president, and the prime minister when the Parliament is in session, besides ranking ministers and members of Parliament, can ill afford to compromise on safety and security. Considering all these aspects, the authorities decided to construct a new building for the Parliament.
Yet one more consideration for the need for a new Parliament building is an anticipated increase in the number of seats for both houses of India’s bicameral Parliament. The size of India’s Parliament is being increased from time to time as per the provisions of the constitution corresponding to the population increase. The first Lok Sabha had 499 members, which was increased to 500 through a constitutional amendment in 1956, and increased again in 1973 to 525 and later rose to 530. Similarly, the number of seats in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) has increased over the years resulting in a space crunch in the debating chambers. After the delimitation of the constituencies of the Lok Sabha and state legislatures is completed, the number of seats in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha is likely to rise further. The issue was also a factor when deciding whether to construct a new parliament building.
It was against this backdrop that the foundation stone of the new parliament building within the precinct’s sprawling Parliament House complex was laid by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Dec. 10, 2020. The construction of the ultra-modern new parliament building is nearing completion in record time and is envisaged to be inaugurated on the occasion of India’s 75th Independence Day this year.
While laying the foundation, Modi said: “If the old Parliament House gave direction to post-independence India, the new building would become a witness to the making of Atmanirbhar Bharat [self-reliant India]. If the old Parliament House worked to fulfill the needs of the country, then the aspirations of 21st century India will be fulfilled in the new building.”
Modi’s message was loud and clear: Institutions are not built from bricks and mortar, but by the people inside them. This includes the officers and staff who help run Parliament, who must be professional, conversant with laws, rules and procedures, and knowledgeable.
Rup Narayan Das is a former officer of the Lok Sabha Secretariat of the Indian Parliament and a Taiwan Fellowship scholar.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS