As a Taiwan Fellowship scholar at National Chung Hsing University and a former officer of the secretariat of the Indian Parliament, which is currently constructing a new parliament building, I read with great interest recent articles about a proposal to construct a new building for the Legislative Yuan and feel impelled to share India’s example.
Most of the Indian Parliament’s buildings were constructed in olden times: Many show signs of aging and struggle to meet the demands of the present day in terms of space, quality and technology. However, since the iconic buildings have great historical value, the authorities are faced with the challenges of maintaining change with continuity.
As India and Taiwan share a convergence of democratic values and parliamentary procedural nuances, Taiwan might benefit from India’s experiences in the conceptualization of the building design, if not the construction — as Taiwan is advanced in this regard — and at a time when the relationship between India and Taiwan is on an upward trajectory.
The present Parliament House is an iconic piece of architecture whose foundation was laid more than a century ago in 1921, when the country was under British rule. The building was inaugurated in January 1927 by the then-viceroy of India Lord Irwin. The Central Legislative Assembly met for the first time in the newly built Parliament House when India was under British rule. The building has been witness to many historic events in the annals of India’s history. The Constituent Assembly adopted the constitution of India in the magnificent Central Hall of the Parliament Building. The building resonates with India’s hallowed history.
However, with the passage of time, the building has reached the threshold of its limits. A report by the secretariat of the Lok Sabha (Popular House) said that the building has been showing signs of distress due to overutilization.
Changing circumstances and advances in technology have necessitated a demand in terms of space, amenities and technology upgrades. Fire safety measures have also been upgraded. A building that hosts high dignitaries like the president, and the prime minister when the Parliament is in session, besides ranking ministers and members of Parliament, can ill afford to compromise on safety and security. Considering all these aspects, the authorities decided to construct a new building for the Parliament.
Yet one more consideration for the need for a new Parliament building is an anticipated increase in the number of seats for both houses of India’s bicameral Parliament. The size of India’s Parliament is being increased from time to time as per the provisions of the constitution corresponding to the population increase. The first Lok Sabha had 499 members, which was increased to 500 through a constitutional amendment in 1956, and increased again in 1973 to 525 and later rose to 530. Similarly, the number of seats in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) has increased over the years resulting in a space crunch in the debating chambers. After the delimitation of the constituencies of the Lok Sabha and state legislatures is completed, the number of seats in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha is likely to rise further. The issue was also a factor when deciding whether to construct a new parliament building.
It was against this backdrop that the foundation stone of the new parliament building within the precinct’s sprawling Parliament House complex was laid by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Dec. 10, 2020. The construction of the ultra-modern new parliament building is nearing completion in record time and is envisaged to be inaugurated on the occasion of India’s 75th Independence Day this year.
While laying the foundation, Modi said: “If the old Parliament House gave direction to post-independence India, the new building would become a witness to the making of Atmanirbhar Bharat [self-reliant India]. If the old Parliament House worked to fulfill the needs of the country, then the aspirations of 21st century India will be fulfilled in the new building.”
Modi’s message was loud and clear: Institutions are not built from bricks and mortar, but by the people inside them. This includes the officers and staff who help run Parliament, who must be professional, conversant with laws, rules and procedures, and knowledgeable.
Rup Narayan Das is a former officer of the Lok Sabha Secretariat of the Indian Parliament and a Taiwan Fellowship scholar.
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
The licensing of medical professionals with overseas degrees has again aroused heated debate, and many dentists held a protest in Taipei on Nov. 24. The controversy stemmed from an amendment to the Physicians’ Act (醫師法) in 2001 allowing people who studied overseas to be qualified to take the first stage of the two-stage national medical licensing exam. As more countries joined the EU after the passing of the amendment, overseas study agencies have advertised English-language medical programs in Europe, targeting people who could not qualify for local medical schools. Examination Yuan data showed that, from the late 2000s, the number
RSS