While the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world in 2020, Taiwanese were adding more healthy years to their lives, Ministry of Health and Welfare data revealed last week.
Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) measure the amount of time lost to severe illness, disability or premature death. As with all good metrics, this one is able to plainly spell out an issue integral to our lived experience, helping society make decisions that could get people through the toughest times in their lives. Hiding behind this dispassionate acronym are years of struggle, costly treatment and impossible decisions about how to receive care and when enough is enough. Even a slight drop in this figure means decades of more time spent with loved ones.
This is why the figure announced by the ministry was so encouraging. The DALY measure during the first year of the pandemic was 8.04, down the equivalent of 5.16 months from 8.47 a year earlier. The average healthy lifespan for 2020 was 73.28 years, the highest since at least 2001 and the greatest annual jump recorded. It rose from 72.39 years in 2019.
The numbers came as a surprise, even to some experts. When the 2019 figures were released last year, Chiu Hung-yi (邱弘毅), professor of public health at Taipei Medical University, predicted that foregoing exercise and medical treatment to stay at home during the pandemic would exacerbate existing conditions and make the population less healthy on average.
On the contrary, people were healthier for longer, likely thanks to COVID-19 preventive measures. Mask wearing and hand washing — even when implemented intermittently before last year’s domestic outbreak — all but eliminated the common cold and the flu season in 2020, which can be deadly to certain people. Experts can now investigate which conditions are exacerbated by which infectious diseases and craft responses that could save lives.
Without clear statistical proof, it would be easy to give in to pessimistic assumptions such as Chiu’s and downplay the good that can come from the bad. Instead, an opportunity to improve lives has been created.
Chen Ying-ren (陳英仁), a geriatric specialist at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, said that the other reason for the DALY decline involves changing attitudes toward hospice care and end-of-life treatment. Although a deeply personal decision, even this changing cultural value has been informed by data transparency. Taiwan’s detailed records of medical expenditures and causes of death revealed immense medical futility, at some estimates comprising up to one-third of all healthcare expenses. Medical futility refers to interventions that are unlikely to produce any significant benefit for the patient.
Concern about the burden this places on the National Health Insurance system, paired with the humanitarian desire to allow patients to die with dignity, informed the landmark passage of the Hospice Palliative Care Act (安寧緩和醫療條例) in 2000 and the Patient Right to Autonomy Act (病人自主權利法) in 2016, still the most progressive of their kind in Asia.
Even now, after COVID-19 has finally breached the nation’s defenses, data transparency remains one of the most powerful tools at people’s disposal. Daily tallies showing the number, percentage and background of moderate and severe cases allow the public to cut through the fearmongering and run informed personal risk calculations as the nation moves into the next stage of the pandemic.
Of course, public health is not the only sector improved by reliable statistics. Data-driven governance helps officials and the public alike simplify Taiwan’s massive and multifarious society, enabling everyone to better understand each other and keep improving together.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Tuesday returned from her visit to the US, where she had met with several US senators and representatives, think tanks, and overseas Taiwanese and Chinese communities, espousing her vision of promoting cross-strait dialogue as a way to evade war. On Monday last week, she sat down with US academic Orville Schell and Asia Society Policy Institute distinguished fellow Daniel Russel. Russel is a seasoned diplomat who has served in positions related to East Asian and Indo-Pacific affairs. At the conclusion of the discussion, Russel employed his considerable diplomatic experience and knowledge
I arrived in Taiwan when I was 18, fresh out of high school and trying to navigate university life. Everything felt unfamiliar. My broken Mandarin quickly revealed what I already knew: I was not from here. When I told people I was from Indonesia, many told me that I did not look Indonesian. This caught me off guard, not because it was cruel, but because of how casually it was said. Sometimes it came with curiosity, sometimes surprise, occasionally admiration for my “fair skin.” More often than not, the people asking meant no harm. It is understandable. I look ethnically
Nearly three decades after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has become a paradox: a place where financial dynamism coexists with political repression — a reality Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Despite a sharp contraction of civic freedoms since 2020, Hong Kong remains a major global financial center. It has recently overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub, supported by steady inflows of capital from China and across Asia. The territory continues to serve as a key intermediary linking Chinese firms, multinational investors and global markets. Institutional continuity has played a role. The Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
In the aftermath of China’s expulsion of the New York Times correspondent Vivian Wang (王月眉), Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) has publicly and explicitly articulated Beijing’s core thinking on the Taiwan issue. Chinese authorities accused the newspaper of promoting what they called “Taiwan independence fallacies,” and said that its description of Taiwan as a country amounts to a challenge to the “one China” principle. The significance of the incident goes beyond the reporting dispute and has given the international community a window into the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attitude toward Taiwan. Lin, in a statement, said