With the Russian invasion of Ukraine highlighting concerns that Taiwan might be next to be attacked, the erroneous airing of news tickers announcing that Chinese missiles had struck New Taipei City on the Chinese Television System (CTS) aroused the interest of international media.
CTS is part of the Taiwan Broadcasting System (TBS), along with Public Television Service (PTS), which last month revealed that a contractor in February had mistakenly deleted news clips from its digital archive. The mistakes at these stations must be attributed to systemic problems within TBS.
Squabbling between the pan-blue and pan-green camps has left the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation without its quota of members for a management team or board of directors, which should have been filled in 2019. For the past two years, they have had to fare with term extensions and acting members.
The management team’s hands are tied, and unable to make changes, they are obliged to follow precedent. The Ministry of Culture, as the overseeing authority, must resolve the structural problems in the organization.
The National Communications Commission (NCC) needs to determine whether the news ticker errors contravened the Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法), which states: “The contents of radio/television programs shall not … disrupt public order or adversely affect good social customs.”
Taiwan has 18 television news channels serving 9 million households, making it one of the highest-density markets in the world. Fierce competition for advertising and viewers has led to a deterioration in quality and diversity of content. This has been a disservice to viewers for many years.
News media are intended to provide public oversight, but the current crop of TV programs and daily political talk shows have been hijacked by the pan-blue and pan-green political parties, exacerbating social divisions.
Hosts unbeholden to term limits exploit their influence to maximize their interests, some promoting the “blue fighters” and blurring the boundaries between media and politics. Others defend the policies of the government of the day, irrespective of the party in power.
The NCC should establish a transparent year-by-year evaluation system and a six-year license renewal review to remove poorly performing news channels from the market and attract better ones.
Second, it should limit the evening chat-style political opinion programs to 30 minutes and introduce more international news reports to expand awareness of global issues.
Third, it should implement a regular license renewal system to encourage talking head shows to introduce more diverse content that explores major issues such as education, housing, the aging population, international politics and finance, or by featuring guests from diverse backgrounds. The hosts should also be regularly changed to better address audience’s needs.
The NCC should not approve more news channels until these reforms are implemented.
The commission has reluctantly granted a license to Mirror TV’s news station, with a number of provisions attached along with a probationary period, during which it has changed directors on several occasions. There is reason to believe it has contravened other conditions.
Additionally, one of its major shareholders has ties with banks and was involved in a financial scandal, going against the principle of separating news media from the financial entities they cover.
The NCC has an opportunity to address these issues, and it should take it.
Jang Show-ling is an adjunct professor in National Taiwan University’s economics department.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the