Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will be discussed in Taiwan long after it ends because success or failure in war is not only about lives, but also about how Taiwanese interpret history, educate the next generation and shape their cultural identities.
The shadow of empire is everywhere, and it looms over Taiwan like small dark clouds in a sunny sky.
Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to make his mark in history by restoring the glory of the Russian Empire as it stood for three centuries. Media such as the Liberty Times [the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper] have discussed how dictators inevitably gravitate toward imperial aggression, and how capitulationism might still exist today.
On the other hand, the dreams of great-power glory that some people cling to, plus the preponderance of Chinese-made palace dramas and cultural programs on Taiwanese television, make it easy for them to be lured into identifying with empire.
The Ming and Qing dynasties — or even going as far back as the Han and Tang — were all empires. The education that some Taiwanese received aimed to instill in them the ideas of these empires, including their territories and culture, as if all Taiwanese belonged to the same country — China — only with a different dynastic title.
Over the past four centuries, Taiwan’s indigenous people and immigrants from continental China alike have been exploited and treated unequally by successive empires.
If Taiwanese continue to unconsciously praise the emperors of a supposed golden age and the glorious military achievements of their generals, the population would forget the ordinary people who lost their lives and property to war.
One thing that has changed for the better is that high-school history textbooks no longer feed students such illusions.
I am optimistic that 20 years from now Taiwan’s identity could reflect who its people really are. Until that day comes, Taiwan must walk the straight and narrow path and think about how to make its history known to the world, including the citizens of China.
The war between Ukrainian and Russia could also affect the illusory notion of” Greater China.” It could shape and identify who Taiwanese are, what they choose to do with their lives, and confirm that Taiwan is a small, yet beautiful and glorious island nation.
Huang Chin-lun is an oncologist.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS