Three years ago, Taiwanese media reported that the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology was developing three new missiles: the Tien Kung III (Sky Bow III, 天弓三) surface-to-air low-altitude air defense missile; the Tien Chien II (Sky Sword II, 天劍二) medium-range air-to-air missile; and the Hsiung Feng IIIE (Brave Wind IIIE, 增程雄風三), an extended range variant of the Hsiung Feng III supersonic anti-ship cruise missile. The weapons, which are reportedly ready for mass production, represent a huge leap forward in realizing the military’s “multilayered deterrence” strategy.
When the new missiles were announced, criticism from some quarters said they were unnecessary and would drain the defense budget.
After legislators passed a special defense budget in January to boost spending on air and naval capabilities, the existence of another new missile was revealed following more than a decade of rumors. The Hsiung Sheng (Brave Ascent, 雄昇) surface-to-surface land-attack cruise missile was ready for mass production. The news put an end to the naysayers.
While it is still possible to class the Tien Kung III, Tien Chien II and Hsiung Feng IIIE as defensive weapons, the Hsiung Sheng, with a reported range of 1,200km, is unquestionably an offensive missile. Fired from Taiwan proper, it is capable of hitting targets deep inside China.
QUIET AGREEMENT
Taiwan’s powerful new offensive strike capability might have been expected to attract criticism, yet there has been none. The reason should be obvious: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
As strategic weapons evolved and modernized, Ukraine gave up its aging Soviet-era nuclear deterrent. In contrast, Taiwan’s indigenous nuclear weapons program, dubbed the Hsinchu Project, was halted after the former deputy director of the institute’s nuclear division, Chang Hsien-yi (張憲義), defected to the US, and Washington pressured Taipei to shut down the project.
The result of Taiwan and Ukraine’s lack of a nuclear weapon is the same: The militaries of both nations cannot threaten a nuclear “fountainhead counterstrike” as a strategic deterrent against their respective enemies.
Taiwan researched and developed medium-range missiles because older missiles needed to be replaced, and reform and modernization of the military has for a long time been predicated on the assumption that Washington would not dispatch soldiers to assist Taiwan in a war with China.
This thinking has been proven correct by events in Ukraine.
CEASEFIRE
The Tien Kung III, Tien Chien II and Hsiung Feng IIIE missiles have been in development for more than a decade.
Under the “diplomatic ceasefire” cross-strait policy of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the missile programs were slowed or suspended. The “diplomatic ceasefire” lasted only a few years before China resumed its intimidation and military threats toward Taiwan.
Taiwan is not Canada or Palau. With the US as its neighbor, Canada only needs to maintain modest armed forces, while Palau has no independent military and relies on the US for its defense.
Although Washington has significantly eased restrictions on military hardware sales, Taiwan still needs to build and maintain defense self-reliance and grow its domestic defense industry.
Will Wei is an engineer in the machining industry.
Translated by Edward Jones
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS