A large trade surplus, ample liquidity, strong capital inflows and low interest rates continue to boost property prices in Taiwan this year, prompting the central bank last week to announce a new round of selective credit controls on local banks. The action was unsurprising, as mortgages still make up most bank lending and speculative transactions have been reported in several cities.
At its quarterly board meeting on Thursday, the central bank amended the Regulations Governing the Extension of Mortgage Loans by Financial Institutions (中央銀行對金融機構辦理不動產抵押貸款業務規定), effective from Friday, to create stricter loan-to-value (LTV) limits on property purchases. Those measures include lowering the LTV ratio on mortgages for a third home or luxury housing to 40 percent, land loans to 50 percent and loans for unsold new housing to 40 percent, while capping the LTV ratio on mortgages for idle land in industrial districts at 40 percent.
The central bank has implemented selective credit control measures three times since December last year to curb property and land hoarding. A fourth round shows that such measures remain the go-to tool for monetary policymakers, rather than aggressive policy tightening, to contain real-estate prices as the bank aims to slowly cool down an overheated property sector.
Together with other actions implemented by ministries over the past year — such as an actual-price registration system for all property transactions, an amendment to integrated house and land transaction income taxes, higher tax rates on the sales of properties within five years of purchase and stricter requirements on presale project transfers — these moves clearly show policymakers’ intention to discourage speculative transactions through a concerted effort.
Nonetheless, as the average mortgage burden ratio of Taiwanese households exceeds 30 percent and the odds of the central bank raising interest rates in the second half of next year are high, borrowers — especially young first-home buyers and those who are highly leveraged — need to prepare for an increase in payments after the grace period.
Moves to lower LTV ratios would increase pressure on most investors, but would not affect those with deep pockets, especially construction firms and land developers. As long as the interest rate remains relatively low, decreasing LTV ratios would hardly place any pressure on them. However, the government’s actions are a warning to the real-estate market and suggest that it wants to reduce the risk of a self-reinforcing cycle of price increases, which would affect housing affordability and could force conservative builders to slow their pace of purchasing and developing land, as they would wait for any other new policies in the pipeline.
The housing market is cyclical, and there is clear upward momentum in prices and transaction volumes, given positive forecasts by a number of banks and real-estate agencies.
The government has the tough job of promoting sound development of the real-estate market in the medium-to-long term, while ensuring that housing prices remain affordable and not run ahead of economic fundamentals. It does not want its cooling measures to hurt genuine buyers looking for a place to live, especially first-time home buyers.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its