If the financial services industry was a nation, it would rank as the world’s fifth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases.
A study authored by the Sierra Club and the Center for American Progress shows that eight of the biggest US banks and 10 of its largest asset managers combined to finance an estimated 2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, based on year-end disclosures from last year, or about 1 percent less than Russia produced.
The emissions are equal to 432 million passenger vehicles driven for one year — and the number would have been considerably higher if scope 3 data and other factors were included. (Scope 3 represents the emissions produced by a company’s supply chain and customers.)
Illustration: Lance Liu
What are the financial consequences of such atmospheric destruction?
The report’s authors are urging the US government to take immediate steps to slash the financial sector’s role in climate change, lest it trigger a financial crisis that dwarfs that of 2008.
Unless the White House manages the transition away from a fossil fuels in an orderly way, the consequences would spread across the financial system and lead to “dire impacts for the entire US economy,” the report says.
The report notes that insurer Swiss Re in May wrote that the global economy risks losing more than 18 percent of GDP by 2048 if no action on the climate crisis is taken. For perspective, the US economy contracted by about 4.3 percent during the Great Recession.
Just like 2008, the people who would be most damaged by a climate crisis-induced crash are those who did the least to cause it — ethnic minority communities and low-income earners, the researchers said.
“Wall Street’s toxic fossil fuel investments threaten the future of our planet and the stability of our financial system, and put all of us, especially our most vulnerable communities, at risk,” said Ben Cushing, manager of the Sierra Club’s Fossil-Free Finance campaign. “Regulators can no longer ignore Wall Street’s staggering contribution to the climate crisis.”
US President Joe Biden last week signed an executive order directing the government to dramatically shrink its carbon footprint, with a goal of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions across all of its operations by 2050.
Biden is calling for US agencies to spend billions of dollars on electric vehicles, clean power and upgraded buildings to reach the target.
According to authors of the new report, Wall Street’s Carbon Bubble, Biden has to go after banks and investment firms, too.
“Disclosure is an essential and foundational step in mitigating market risk,” the 24-page report says. “However, disclosure alone isn’t enough and must be paired with prudential regulation.”
To mitigate climate-related financial risks posed by Wall Street’s exposure to high carbon-emitting industries, the report states that regulators, including the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the US Department of Labor, should at least take the following steps:
Require all financial institutions disclose all emissions embedded in their portfolios and attributable to businesses for whom they provide services.
Ensure that investment fiduciaries keep their commitments to clients and the public, including those related to how they invest and vote their shares.
Incorporate climate risk into the supervisory ratings they assign to banks.
Administer climate-related stress tests to identify the banks’ potential losses from climate change (Moody’s Investors Service estimates that banks globally have US$22 trillion of exposure to carbon-intensive industries).
Require that banks fund riskier investments with more equity capital and less debt.
Implement climate-risk surcharges on “global systemically important banks.”
Adjust deposit insurance premiums to reflect climate-related risks.
Proactively address racial and economic justice issues that intersect with such climate-risk related reforms.
Who is behind all that carbon dioxide and perhaps the next financial crisis?
JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc, Wells Fargo & Co and Bank of America Corp have been the largest providers of funding to the fossil-fuel industry. Together, the eight banks in the report financed an estimated 668 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (equal to 145 million passenger vehicles driven for one year) through the US$5.3 trillion of credit exposure assessed by the researchers.
The 10 asset managers’ activities led to 1.3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent, or 287 million passenger vehicles.
Continued unfettered emissions supported by the financial industry mean deadly wildfires, droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, floods and other extreme weather events would only become worse, and “efforts to mitigate emissions will only become more challenging and costly,” the report says.
Ironically, the financial sector is just as much at risk from the very emissions that it is funding, since the ripple effects of a warming planet could lead to catastrophic losses for global capital markets.
“If left unaddressed, climate change could lead to a financial crisis larger than any in living memory,” Andres Vinelli, vice president of economic policy at the Center for American Progress, wrote in the report.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
RSS