The US Congress is considering changes to the “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing alliance of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US, but expanding it would be worse than a mistake.
US Representative Ruben Gallego, the chairman of the US House Intelligence and Special Operations Subcommittee, added language to the fiscal 2022 US National Defense Authorization Act, calling for the inclusion of Germany, Japan, India and South Korea to the alliance.
Gallego called Five Eyes “outdated,” adding that its scope should be expanded and “shouldn’t just be an Anglophile view of [intelligence] sharing.” The revised provision asserts that “the threat landscape has vastly changed since the inception of the Five Eyes arrangement, with primary threats now emanating from China and Russia.” Accordingly, the alliance should “expand the circle of trust to other like-minded democracies.”
There are two good reasons not to make Five Eyes into “Nine Eyes.”
First, expanding the alliance would not help counter threats from China and Russia. Rather, it could potentially exacerbate them. Journalist Michael Weiss, who has written extensively on intelligence matters, told me that “the unwritten provision of the agreement is that we do not spy on another or recruit another’s citizens.” Yet, as Weiss points out, Germany and India have had members of their political and financial elite penetrated by hostile foreign intelligence services, as have Japan and South Korea. National security analyst Tom Rogan said that Seoul also “shares the French DGSE’s [Directorate-General for External Security’s] predilection of spying on US economic targets.”
Germany in particular has long been a playground for foreign intelligence services — including that of the US. High-profile German politicians, such as former chancellor Gerhard Schroder, have gone to work for companies with close ties to Russian intelligence services.
Perhaps more importantly, the terms and spirit that underpin Five Eyes would not lend themselves to an expansion to the countries in question. Promising to cease intelligence operations in India, Germany and the rest would be a promise that the Five Eyes allies could not — and should not — keep. It would hinder intelligence gathering and warp intelligence analysis.
Additionally, Weiss said that “we can be allied with these countries without being willfully blind fools about what goes on in them.” Yet, if the principles that underlie the intelligence pact are extended to the proposed countries, this would be exactly what would happen — and it would be unnecessary. Indeed, all of the current signatories to the arrangement maintain close intelligence relations to the countries being considered.
The US and the UK, for example, have a long history of working closely with the German Federal Intelligence Service. The Japanese Public Security Intelligence Agency was created with heavy involvement from US occupation authorities, and is, to some extent, modeled after Britain’s legendary MI5. As the Council on Foreign Relations has documented, the CIA also “assisted in the creation of” the Indian Research and Analysis Wing.
Indeed, in the past three years, the US has agreed to share military communications and bases with India. Such capabilities have long existed in Germany, Japan and South Korea. Although there have been some bumps on the road — notably India was long suspicious of the close relationships of the US and the UK with its rival Pakistan — all countries have maintained close ties with those already in Five Eyes.
Additional layers of bureaucracy can hinder intelligence gathering and analysis. Put simply: Expanding Five Eyes would be an unnecessary risk.
Sean Durns is a Washington-based foreign affairs analyst.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS