During the Third Walk Bell John Awards, which recognize content creators, held on Nov. 13, many winners and presenters mentioned the problem of comments by Internet trolls.
The Internet age has brought one particular headache for the content industry: What to do about the comments sections on social media platforms?
Can they be left on their own? Can they function as a way to interact with readers? Can they be done away with entirely?
Journalism is a part of the content industry, and the content it produces is crucial to the public interest, which means that these issues are important.
The Poynter Institute, a US-based non-profit journalism school and research organization, has published a study by the Center for Media Engagement, Moody College of Communication at the University of Texas at Austin, that provides a map for considering these issues.
According to the study, a comments section has three characteristics. First, a small number of commenters generate the majority of the comments, essentially monopolizing the section. Second, interactions, if left unmoderated, often devolve into racist, misogynistic maelstroms. Finally, negative online comments on an article might influence a consumer’s decision about whether they want to read the article, but positive comments would not create a positive impression. This is also true for comments sections on social media platforms.
Why keep a comments section then? The study says it increases the time consumers spend on the Web site, and some journalists believe that a reader’s right to respond should be protected.
However, the comments section cannot be left unmoderated. My own experience working in the media tells me that, if it is left to its own devices, it would descend into chaos, generating only increasingly offensive and stupid opinions, in addition to advertising posts.
Unfortunately, given the current situation of the news industry, very few outlets have the resources to fully moderate their comments sections.
Should these sections be removed then? The online news media in the US did turn it off for a period; indeed, one can find lots of memes by googling the phrase “Do not read the comments.” It is not even as though many people would notice.
According to the study, when an outlet turns off the comments section, only 10 percent of the Web site visitors realize it. The downside of getting rid of it is the reduced time spent on the Web pages and the restriction of readers’ right to express their opinion.
A quick glance at the Web sites of the four major newspapers in Taiwan, and news Web sites such as Mirror Media, Up Media and the Reporter, shows that except for the Reporter, the rest have comments sections under their news and opinion articles, and they all use a Facebook comments plug-in, with the exception of udn.com, which uses both a Facebook plug-in and its own online commenting system.
Most of those comments sections are placed at the bottom of a Web page, making one wonder how many people actually read them. Perhaps keeping the comments section is just a product of inertia.
News outlets should carefully consider whether to keep or drop the comments sections on their Web sites. Although they could increase the time visitors spend on their site, they could also slow down the loading of a Web page.
Also, as the comments section appears at the bottom of a page, most people who read the articles do not scroll down to read the comments — if they do, the negative comments only put them off and discourage them from coming back to the Web site.
Lacking staff to moderate and manage the comments sections only leads to advertising and discriminating posts growing out of control.
Media outlets should turn off their comments sections for a while — or at least choose some categories for trial to see how it works. As for readers’ right to express their opinion, this can be guaranteed on the media outlets’ official pages on Facebook or other social platforms.
Chang Yueh-han is an adjunct assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s department of journalism.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS