During the Third Walk Bell John Awards, which recognize content creators, held on Nov. 13, many winners and presenters mentioned the problem of comments by Internet trolls.
The Internet age has brought one particular headache for the content industry: What to do about the comments sections on social media platforms?
Can they be left on their own? Can they function as a way to interact with readers? Can they be done away with entirely?
Journalism is a part of the content industry, and the content it produces is crucial to the public interest, which means that these issues are important.
The Poynter Institute, a US-based non-profit journalism school and research organization, has published a study by the Center for Media Engagement, Moody College of Communication at the University of Texas at Austin, that provides a map for considering these issues.
According to the study, a comments section has three characteristics. First, a small number of commenters generate the majority of the comments, essentially monopolizing the section. Second, interactions, if left unmoderated, often devolve into racist, misogynistic maelstroms. Finally, negative online comments on an article might influence a consumer’s decision about whether they want to read the article, but positive comments would not create a positive impression. This is also true for comments sections on social media platforms.
Why keep a comments section then? The study says it increases the time consumers spend on the Web site, and some journalists believe that a reader’s right to respond should be protected.
However, the comments section cannot be left unmoderated. My own experience working in the media tells me that, if it is left to its own devices, it would descend into chaos, generating only increasingly offensive and stupid opinions, in addition to advertising posts.
Unfortunately, given the current situation of the news industry, very few outlets have the resources to fully moderate their comments sections.
Should these sections be removed then? The online news media in the US did turn it off for a period; indeed, one can find lots of memes by googling the phrase “Do not read the comments.” It is not even as though many people would notice.
According to the study, when an outlet turns off the comments section, only 10 percent of the Web site visitors realize it. The downside of getting rid of it is the reduced time spent on the Web pages and the restriction of readers’ right to express their opinion.
A quick glance at the Web sites of the four major newspapers in Taiwan, and news Web sites such as Mirror Media, Up Media and the Reporter, shows that except for the Reporter, the rest have comments sections under their news and opinion articles, and they all use a Facebook comments plug-in, with the exception of udn.com, which uses both a Facebook plug-in and its own online commenting system.
Most of those comments sections are placed at the bottom of a Web page, making one wonder how many people actually read them. Perhaps keeping the comments section is just a product of inertia.
News outlets should carefully consider whether to keep or drop the comments sections on their Web sites. Although they could increase the time visitors spend on their site, they could also slow down the loading of a Web page.
Also, as the comments section appears at the bottom of a page, most people who read the articles do not scroll down to read the comments — if they do, the negative comments only put them off and discourage them from coming back to the Web site.
Lacking staff to moderate and manage the comments sections only leads to advertising and discriminating posts growing out of control.
Media outlets should turn off their comments sections for a while — or at least choose some categories for trial to see how it works. As for readers’ right to express their opinion, this can be guaranteed on the media outlets’ official pages on Facebook or other social platforms.
Chang Yueh-han is an adjunct assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s department of journalism.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under