The central pledge of a planned new global nature pact — to protect 30 percent of the planet’s land and seas — is in doubt, with some biodiversity-rich nations refusing to commit because of jitters over funding and implementation, officials have said.
A coalition of about 70 countries — including wealthy G7 governments — have promised to conserve at least 30 percent of their land and oceans by 2030, a pledge known as 30x30, to help curb climate change and the loss of plant and animal species.
The 30x30 goal is part of a draft global treaty to safeguard plants, animals and ecosystems, due to be finalized in May next year at the COP15 nature summit in the Kunming, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) said.
“Many countries are supporting it, but also many countries are not supporting it. It is still very much for debate,” CBD executive secretary Elizabeth Maruma Mrema said, adding that effective management of a 30x30 goal would be key.
Improving protection of natural areas, such as parks, oceans, forests and wildernesses, is seen as vital to maintaining the ecosystems on which humans depend, and to limiting global warming to internationally agreed targets.
Dozens of nations pledged to do more to conserve nature and make farming greener at the COP26 UN climate talks this month.
Brian O’Donnell, director of the US-based Campaign for Nature, which is urging leaders to back the 30x30 pledge, said it was “perhaps the most supported target in the negotiations.”
There is broad scientific consensus that protecting or conserving at least 30 percent of land and oceans is the minimum needed to curb biodiversity loss and to reach climate goals, he added.
However, the inclusion of the pledge in the final COP15 accord is far from certain, with improvements needed, some green groups have said.
“Like it or not, 30x30 will be one of the defining issues for COP15,” Greenpeace China policy adviser Li Shuo said.
“The Kunming biodiversity summit will not be a success only with this target, but it will certainly not be seen as a triumph if without [it],” he added.
WAIT AND SEE
Southeast Asia covers just 3 percent of the Earth’s surface, but is home to three of the world’s 17 “mega-diverse” countries — Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.
It is also the only region where a significant number of countries have yet to back the 30x30 goal, with only Cambodia signing up so far, O’Donnell said.
South Africa, meanwhile, has called for a much lower target of 20 percent, he added, while others such as Argentina have questioned the science behind the flagship pledge.
On a more positive note, India is the latest country to commit to 30x30.
At the first part of the COP15 talks, held online last month, host nation China announced a new national parks project that would bring 230,000km2 of land under stronger state protection.
While China has yet to endorse the 30x30 pledge, the signs are that it might be getting ready to do so at the Kunming summit, Nature Conservancy director of biodiversity Linda Krueger said.
Opposition to the 30x30 goal is largely linked to the challenges of putting it into practice, such as financing for developing nations, high population density, low levels of biodiversity and lack of domestic laws, environmentalists said.
However, Krueger said she had only heard Brazil clearly speak out against it.
“Many countries seem to be on the fence, and the support of others is conditioned on adequate financing being made available,” she added.
Some political leaders have yet to grasp the economic benefits of conservation, with many still relying on exploitation of natural resources to lift people out of poverty, green groups said.
Others are home to a large proportion of the planet’s biodiversity and want a protection target higher than 30 percent.
Despite these hurdles, there is significant momentum to land the 30x30 goal in the deal, said Susan Lieberman, vice president of international policy at the Wildlife Conservation Society.
Some countries are still studying how it would play out in their own contexts, she added.
“Many governments do not realize this is a global target and each country will contribute to achievement of the targets in different ways,” Lieberman said.
“Governments need to look not only at area-based conservation within their own territories, but at what their ‘footprint’ is globally,” she said, pointing to procurement of commodities such as timber and fish.
There are also concerns that the 30x30 target threatens the rights of indigenous and local communities, and that new protected areas could dispossess those groups, said Guido Broekhoven, head of policy research and development at World Wide Fund for Nature International.
These are the very people who for generations have done the most to sustain, defend and restore biodiversity, Broekhoven said.
The 30x30 pledge should be far more effective in halting and reversing biodiversity loss if protected areas are situated in the most important parts of the planet for biodiversity and ecosystem services, he said.
That means achieving the target should be “a collective, global effort,” he added, calling for more financing.
Countries with relatively few suitable areas should contribute as much as they can to conservation efforts in other biodiversity-rich nations, Broekhoven said.
However, 30x30 is not “a panacea,” he said, adding that the goal should be complemented by reforms to ecologically harmful investment, agriculture and consumption.
“On its own, it will be insufficient to reverse the loss of nature,” he said.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic